Igor Sysoev wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:11:03PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
Then you can export RIB entries , say
you have 5 BGP peers and you want to export 2 or 3 or all of them into
the 'main' routing instance you can set up a policy to add those learned
routes into the main instan
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:11:03PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >Then you can export RIB entries , say
> >you have 5 BGP peers and you want to export 2 or 3 or all of them into
> >the 'main' routing instance you can set up a policy to add those learned
> >routes into the main instance and v-
Julian Elischer wrote:
The interaction with routing daemons is something I don't know
enough about. I need someone who knows routing daemons to tell
how to correctly tweek code that sends routing events.
As long as it doesn't break anything...
I think it is possible that events from a partic
-net added to broaden the conversation
Paul wrote:
The routing daemons run linked separate instances and create their own
RIB. Take a look at Cisco's VRF implementation. You can even have
interfaces assigned to the other routing instance so you could have
em0.001 on routing instance 1 and e
Max Laier wrote:
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 20:19:14 Julian Elischer wrote:
Paul wrote:
I've been waiting for something like this. Linux has done policy
routing for many many years and is very good at it. I prefer to use
FreeBSD for routing though and this is a feature I have been waiting
for :
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 20:19:14 Julian Elischer wrote:
> Paul wrote:
> > I've been waiting for something like this. Linux has done policy
> > routing for many many years and is very good at it. I prefer to use
> > FreeBSD for routing though and this is a feature I have been waiting
> > for :) M
Paul wrote:
I've been waiting for something like this. Linux has done policy
routing for many many years and is very good at it. I prefer to use
FreeBSD for routing though and this is a feature I have been waiting for :)
Mainly to use with BGP , having multiple BGP routing tables. I would
l
I've been waiting for something like this. Linux has done policy
routing for many many years and is very good at it. I prefer to use
FreeBSD for routing though and this is a feature I have been waiting for :)
Mainly to use with BGP , having multiple BGP routing tables. I would
like it to be
Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:44:30AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>A little progress report
>From a recently installed (6.3) machine (plus patches)
Ok, being ignorant to this, possibly a silly question:
Why would i want or need multiple routing tables ?
Martes G Wigglesworth wrote:
Sorry for my late entry into this interesting subject, however, what
exactly was the original post displaying? I have 6.3-Stable running,
and I don't even have the first command listed as "setfib", on my
system.
What did the setfib -l command do, so that you were ab
Sorry for my late entry into this interesting subject, however, what
exactly was the original post displaying? I have 6.3-Stable running,
and I don't even have the first command listed as "setfib", on my
system.
What did the setfib -l command do, so that you were able to see two
distinctly differ
Ivo Vachkov wrote:
when do we get to see those patches ? :)
for -current: http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/mrt.diff
for releng_6: http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/mrt6.diff
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A little progress report
From a recently ins
when do we get to see those patches ? :)
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A little progress report
>
> From a recently installed (6.3) machine (plus patches)
>
> wsa02:julian 9] setfib -0 netstat -rn
> Routing tables
>
> Internet:
> Destination
A little progress report
From a recently installed (6.3) machine (plus patches)
wsa02:julian 9] setfib -0 netstat -rn
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire
default172.28.14.1UGS 0 788 bce1
127.0
14 matches
Mail list logo
