On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:41:49AM +0100, Fabien Thomas wrote:
> That fix on ixgbe would also be great to commit on ixgbe before release.
> This fix a crash on high packet load with bpf (mbuf freed behind bpf
> analysis).
>
A fix to ixgbe to fix ipv6 routing would also be great! :-)
John
> Fab
Yes, code freeze starts Saturday, there have been issues with igb in HEAD
which is why I did not just want to MFC it. I have a driver that now has
been
surviving long term stress (48+ hours of pounding) so I think its what we
should go with, its coming to HEAD today and then PRERELEASE barring
any
That fix on ixgbe would also be great to commit on ixgbe before release.
This fix a crash on high packet load with bpf (mbuf freed behind bpf analysis).
Fabien
patch-ixgbe-bpfcrash
Description: Binary data
>
> On 17.11.2010 23:39, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the
On 17.11.2010 23:39, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the drivers, there has been no
> activity
> because I've tracking down a couple bugs that are tough, involving days
> of testing to reproduce. I know we're getting close and I appreciate any
> reports like this before.
>
Thank you Jack, and thank you Eugene. I will integrate that NULL-check
into my tree immediately.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:39:14AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the drivers, there has been no
> activity
> because I've tracking down a couple bugs that are tough,
Yes, everyone, I plan on updating all the drivers, there has been no
activity
because I've tracking down a couple bugs that are tough, involving days
of testing to reproduce. I know we're getting close and I appreciate any
reports like this before.
Stay tuned
Jack
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 17.11.2010 13:04, Chris Peiffer wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been watching the traffic here over the last few months relating
>> to the em and igb Intel ethernet drivers. It seems like there's a big
>> consensus that HEAD has some good ne
On 17.11.2010 13:04, Chris Peiffer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been watching the traffic here over the last few months relating
> to the em and igb Intel ethernet drivers. It seems like there's a big
> consensus that HEAD has some good new fixes.
>
> Looking at this:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/
Hi,
I've been watching the traffic here over the last few months relating
to the em and igb Intel ethernet drivers. It seems like there's a big
consensus that HEAD has some good new fixes.
Looking at this:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c
There's a pretty big com
> Have you tried disabling speed and duplex negotiation and explicitly
> stating speed and duplex like so?
>
> ifconfig_em0="... media 1000baseTX mediaopt full-duplex"
Disagree with this piece of advice.
> Cisco switches have a notorious history of not being "friendly" with
> non-Cisco hardware.
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 05:29:46PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
>> Have you tried disabling speed and duplex negotiation and explicitly
>> stating speed and duplex like so?
>>
>> ifconfig_em0="... media 1000baseTX mediaopt full-duplex"
>>
>
> I tried it and it doesn't work.
>
>> Cisco switches have a n
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:49:40PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
messages.
The igb driver is for 82575 and 82576 adapters, it has multiqueue support and
MSIX, there will be more serv
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:49:40PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
> Jack Vogel wrote:
>> I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
>> messages.
>>
>> The igb driver is for 82575 and 82576 adapters, it has multiqueue support and
>> MSIX, there will be more server type enhancement
Jack Vogel wrote:
I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
messages.
The igb driver is for 82575 and 82576 adapters, it has multiqueue support and
MSIX, there will be more server type enhancements in that driver as I get the
time.
The em driver now will be client o
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:14:32AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I got the new drivers in Fr
Jack Vogel wrote:
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:14:32AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
> messages.
>
> The igb driver is for 82575 and 82576 adapters, i
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:14:32AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>
> > I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
> > messages.
> >
> > The igb driver is for 82575 and 82576 adapters, it has mul
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:14:32AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
> messages.
>
> The igb driver is for 82575 and 82576 adapters, it has multiqueue support and
> MSIX, there will be more server type enhancements in that driver as I
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:14:32AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
> messages.
[skip]
> As ever, issues and bugs should be sent to me. Cheers everyone!
It seems the MFC to RELENG_7 has broken build of static kernels
having device
I got the new drivers in Friday afternoon for those that don't see CVS
messages.
The igb driver is for 82575 and 82576 adapters, it has multiqueue support and
MSIX, there will be more server type enhancements in that driver as I get the
time.
The em driver now will be client oriented, the latest
20 matches
Mail list logo
