[Bug 191786] [bce] bce link state changes to same state are ignored by lagg

2024-12-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191786 Alexander Vereeken changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Alexander88207@protonmail.c

[Bug 191786] [bce] [patch] bce link state changes to same state are ignored by lagg

2022-11-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191786 Graham Perrin changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Graham P

iflib NICs don't report/recognize link state changes [Was: Re: if_em(4) carrier loss event not recognized with i217; while 82574 does recognize]

2019-09-18 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
Am 18.09.2019 um 08:21 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer: Am 11.05.2018 um 19:26 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:   Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 21:17 (localtime):   Hello, if I pull the TP connection from my i217 Clarkville, HEAD still reports media 1000Base-T status "active".

Re: Intel 82567V-2 using em driver, no carrier or constant link-state changes with 1000BaseT

2016-12-01 Thread Sean Bruno
On 12/01/16 13:07, Pieper, Jeffrey E wrote: > Sean, > > This is a client (em) part, and should be 10CE (Boazman/Boulder Creek). > > Jeff Yeah, you're right. I think I transposed some numbers instead of copy/paste. Do you have this part lying around to test against? sean signature.asc Des

RE: Intel 82567V-2 using em driver, no carrier or constant link-state changes with 1000BaseT

2016-12-01 Thread Pieper, Jeffrey E
-Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Sean Bruno Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 9:53 AM To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel 82567V-2 using em driver, no carrier or constant link-state changes with

Re: Intel 82567V-2 using em driver, no carrier or constant link-state changes with 1000BaseT

2016-12-01 Thread Sean Bruno
On 11/27/16 12:40, Michael Knap wrote: > Preface: I've been a long-time linux user, and I am enjoying the BSD > experience. For the following scenario, I have reproduced these results > with 3 or more cables which are known to be good. > > Using FreeBSD 10.3 Stable : > FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 r29

Intel 82567V-2 using em driver, no carrier or constant link-state changes with 1000BaseT

2016-11-27 Thread Michael Knap
Preface: I've been a long-time linux user, and I am enjoying the BSD experience. For the following scenario, I have reproduced these results with 3 or more cables which are known to be good. Using FreeBSD 10.3 Stable : FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 r295946+07c41cd(9.10-STABLE): Wed Nov 9 00:19:25 UTC 20

[Bug 191786] [bce] [patch] bce link state changes to same state are ignored by lagg

2014-07-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Summary|bce link state changes to |[bce] [patch] bce link |same state are ignored by |state changes to same state |lagg|are ignored by lagg --- Comment #3 from Mark Linimon --- Over to maintainers. -- You are receiving this mail

Link state changes

2010-06-01 Thread Andrew Thompson
> Revision 205024 - (annotate) > Thu Mar 11 17:56:46 2010 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago) by qingli > > The if_tap interface is of IFT_ETHERNET type, but it > does not set or update the if_link_state variable. > As such RT_LINK_IS_UP() fails for the if_tap interface. > > Also, the RT_LINK_IS_UP() needs

bge(4) interface link state changes, bad flaps

2006-10-12 Thread Per Gregers Bilse
ad similar problems. The problem occurs with all if_bge.c versions less than maybe a year old (I haven't investigated in detail). Cutting a long story short, it seems that somewhere along the line some code accounting for encoding errors incorrectly showing up as link state changes has been los

Re: Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-25 Thread Ilya Nikitin
> That's the development branch. I'm talking about the driver version. > Inside the if_bce.c file, you will find this: > > /** >**/ /* BCE Driver Version > */ > /***

Re: Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Monday, September 25, 2006 19:20:22 +0400 Ilya Nikitin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Which driver version is that? I had to update the if_bce.c file from version 0.9.5 to 0.9.6 to correct a problem with the NIC ceasing to pass traffic and requiring a reboot to restore connectivity. (I'm runn

Re: Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-25 Thread Ilya Nikitin
> > Which driver version is that? I had to update the if_bce.c file from > version 0.9.5 to 0.9.6 to correct a problem with the NIC ceasing to pass > traffic and requiring a reboot to restore connectivity. (I'm running 6.1 > RELEASE.) > > Is this a newer version? Yes, it's strongly newer: if_b

Re: Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Monday, September 25, 2006 10:51:54 +0400 Ilya Nikitin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/21/06, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No change. The link state is still floating. /S I've solved this problem by using bge drivers from 6.2-BETA1. There aren't bge flapping now !!! Wh

Re: Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-24 Thread Ilya Nikitin
> On 9/21/06, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No change. The link state is still floating. > > /S I've solved this problem by using bge drivers from 6.2-BETA1. There aren't bge flapping now !!! Ilya Nikitin, Syste

Re: Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-21 Thread Slawek Zak
On 9/21/06, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:32:56PM +0200, Slawek Zak wrote: S> >Please try to add hw.bge.fake_autoneg=1 to /boot/loader.conf. May be S> >this will help. S> S> I did it, but sysctl doesn't show the value. S> S> w3-6# sysctl hw.bge S> sysctl: unk

Re: Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-21 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:32:56PM +0200, Slawek Zak wrote: S> >Please try to add hw.bge.fake_autoneg=1 to /boot/loader.conf. May be S> >this will help. S> S> I did it, but sysctl doesn't show the value. S> S> w3-6# sysctl hw.bge S> sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.bge' S> S> This sysctl seems to be defi

Re: Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-21 Thread Slawek Zak
code. When S> I disable internal port on chassis built-in ethernet switch, kernel S> floods syslog with messages about link state changes and coalescing S> them. Log snippet follows: S> S> Sep 13 14:58:28 w3-6 kernel: bge1: link state changed to DOWN S> Sep 13 14:58:28 w3-6 kernel:

Re: Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-15 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
t-in ethernet switch, kernel S> floods syslog with messages about link state changes and coalescing S> them. Log snippet follows: S> S> Sep 13 14:58:28 w3-6 kernel: bge1: link state changed to DOWN S> Sep 13 14:58:28 w3-6 kernel: bge1: link state changed to UP S> Sep 13 14:58:29 w3

Re: Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-14 Thread Slawek Zak
On 9/13/06, David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can't access the information on this web site through Mozilla after clicking "I Accept". Hm. I've just found out that posting direct links to documents is too Web 1.0 for ibm.com. Here is link to the parent page - works for me: http://

RE: Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-13 Thread David Christensen
> I'm testing network failover on IBM BladeCenter running FreeBSD 6.1 > STABLE for Sep 6th. > > I suspect a problem with link state change detection in bge code. When > I disable internal port on chassis built-in ethernet switch, kernel > floods syslog with messages about

Rapid link state changes on bge(4) interface

2006-09-13 Thread Slawek Zak
Hi, I'm testing network failover on IBM BladeCenter running FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE for Sep 6th. I suspect a problem with link state change detection in bge code. When I disable internal port on chassis built-in ethernet switch, kernel floods syslog with messages about link state change