On Mar 1, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Andre Oppermann writes:
> This patch solves the problem by maintaining an offset pointer
in the socket
> buffer to give tcp_output() the closest mbuf right away
avoiding the traversal
> from the beginning.
> > W
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Andre Oppermann writes:
> This patch solves the problem by maintaining an offset pointer in the socket
> buffer to give tcp_output() the closest mbuf right away avoiding the
traversal
> from the beginning.
>
> With this patch we should be able to compete nicely for t
Andre Oppermann writes:
> This patch solves the problem by maintaining an offset pointer in the socket
> buffer to give tcp_output() the closest mbuf right away avoiding the
> traversal
> from the beginning.
>
> With this patch we should be able to compete nicely for the Internet land
> s
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Andre Oppermann wrote:
With the TCP socket buffer autosizing and generally larger socket buffers
for high bandwidth and high delay connections tcp_output() has become
increasingly inefficient for sending segments. For every segment sent it is
traversing the entire socket b
With the TCP socket buffer autosizing and generally larger socket buffers
for high bandwidth and high delay connections tcp_output() has become
increasingly inefficient for sending segments. For every segment sent it
is traversing the entire socket buffer mbuf chain until it finds the offset
to c
