Re: Is there any plan to support GRO

2016-01-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, On 11 January 2016 at 18:18, Hongjiang Zhang wrote: > Hi Hiren, > > Thanks for your information. I found some information from internet > (https://lwn.net/Articles/358910/), which talks the difference of LRO and GRO > on Linux, and it also points out some shortcomings of LRO: breaks things

RE: Is there any plan to support GRO

2016-01-11 Thread Hongjiang Zhang
you please share the plan for LRO improvement? Thanks. -Original Message- From: hiren panchasara [mailto:hi...@strugglingcoder.info] Sent: 2016年1月11日 23:43 To: Hongjiang Zhang Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any plan to support GRO On 01/11/16 at 11:19P, Hongjiang

Re: Is there any plan to support GRO

2016-01-11 Thread hiren panchasara
On 01/11/16 at 11:19P, Hongjiang Zhang wrote: > Is there any plan to support GRO (Generic Receive Offloading)? Not that I am aware of. Though there are efforts/talks/patches to improve LRO. Cheers, Hiren pgpI599kBBDQ0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Is there any plan to support GRO

2016-01-11 Thread Hongjiang Zhang
Hi all, LRO has been enabled since FreeBSD 7.1. Is there any plan to support GRO (Generic Receive Offloading)? I also found Linux disabled LRO and enabled GRO by default. It looks like GRO is better than LRO. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list