Hello,
> > - Can I make use of that hardware acceleration?
> Not yet. It relies on as-yet undocumented hardware registers and TCB
> formats which Intel will not release documentation for without signing
> an NDA.
Just a stupid question: couldn't pdeuskar@ help on this topic?
Or is it all about th
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:33:13PM +0200, Marc Ernst Eddy van Woerkom wrote:
> As far as I can tell from a bit of Google
> research, it features hardware encryprtion/decryption.
Check the BGA ASIC. If it's an 82550EY or 82550GY, it should be crypto capable.
The 82559ED may also be crypto capable.
* De: Marc Ernst Eddy van Woerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data:
2002-10-01 ]
[ Subjecte: Intel PRO/100 S ]
> Hi,
>
> yesterday I bought a network card to connect a second PC
> to my old machine.
> They had only one type of card in the store so I bought it anyway,
Hi,
yesterday I bought a network card to connect a second PC
to my old machine.
They had only one type of card in the store so I bought it anyway,
despite its rather high price of 37 Euro.
Today I took a closer look.
It is an Intel PRO/100 S board packaged in
plastic pack, without docs.
It
CTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 2:33 AM
Subject: Re: IPSEC offloading on Intel PRO/100 S
> Is there ANY hardware encryption support in FreeBSD?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Pardon my lack of caffiene; I have a pint mug of tea on my desk now.
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:40:35AM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> >
> > Is there ANY hardware encryption support in FreeBSD?
>
> Things are gradually being rearranged to facilitate this, as part of SMPng.
> At the moment the
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 04:33:04AM -0600, Len Conrad wrote:
>
> > > o Would anybody be interested in my adding support for this beast's crypto
> > > features to the fxp driver?
> >
> >Yes. :)
>
> Is there ANY hardware encryption support in FreeBSD?
Things are gradually being rearranged to fac
> > o Would anybody be interested in my adding support for this beast's crypto
> > features to the fxp driver?
>
>Yes. :)
Is there ANY hardware encryption support in FreeBSD?
Len
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com
* Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020301 01:58] wrote:
>
> o Would anybody be interested in my adding support for this beast's crypto
> features to the fxp driver?
Yes. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
Guys,
A few questions regarding the Intel PRO/100 S Ethernet adapter:
o Has anybody experimented with using the IPSEC ESP 3DES hardware offload
capability of the Intel 82550EY ASIC used within the above NIC?
o Have Intel ever released specs for this ASIC publicly?
o Would anybody be
> >I have got 96% of 100Mbps under real production load.
>
> Wouldn't the TCP/IP overhead + ethernet design (collisions) reduce this
> figure to more like 70Mbs max in the real world?
As has been pointed out, a lot of people run full duplex these days.
With FD ethernet, the maximum achievable b
Hi Bill,
> > >I have got 96% of 100Mbps under real production load.
> >
> > Wouldn't the TCP/IP overhead + ethernet design (collisions) reduce >
>figure to more like 70Mbs max in the real world?
>
>1) when people refer to getting 96% of X Mbps, they're referring to
>ethernet frames, not cute
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 09:07:50AM +, Thor Legvold wrote:
> >I have got 96% of 100Mbps under real production load.
>
> Wouldn't the TCP/IP overhead + ethernet design (collisions) reduce this
> figure to more like 70Mbs max in the real world?
1) when people refer to getting 96% of X Mbps, t
"Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did wax gregarious and thus
spake:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have an Intel Pro 100/S NIC on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE connected to a
>Cisco
> > Catalyst 3500XL switch at 100Mbps, full-
> The hosts are Pentium III 900Mhz machines with 1GB of memory. How do you
> check the duplex configuration? On the switch? On the Windows NT machine?
On your FreeBSD host, you can check it with the "ifconfig" command. If
you have a managed switch, you should be able to get duplex information
thr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On a single NIC? Are the clients getting data from your host or are they
> putting data on the host?
None of above.
It was one of my core routers so it was transit IP traffic through router.
And one of NICs reach almost 100Mbps.
> I have got 96% of 100Mbps under r
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Maximum throughput of Intel Pro 100/S NIC?
> I have an Intel Pro 100/S NIC on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE connected to a Cisco
> Catalyst 3500XL switch at 100Mbps, full-duplex but I only get 15.6Mbps
> throughput. I'm transferring ISO images from the FreeBSD ma
throughput of Intel Pro 100/S NIC?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have an Intel Pro 100/S NIC on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE connected to a Cisco
> Catalyst 3500XL switch at 100Mbps, full-duplex but I only get 15.6Mbps
> throughput. I'm transferring ISO images from the FreeBSD mac
> I have an Intel Pro 100/S NIC on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE connected to a Cisco
> Catalyst 3500XL switch at 100Mbps, full-duplex but I only get 15.6Mbps
> throughput. I'm transferring ISO images from the FreeBSD machine to an NT
> FTP server which is also connected on the same switch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have an Intel Pro 100/S NIC on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE connected to a Cisco
> Catalyst 3500XL switch at 100Mbps, full-duplex but I only get 15.6Mbps
> throughput. I'm transferring ISO images from the FreeBSD machine to an NT
> F
Hi,
I have an Intel Pro 100/S NIC on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE connected to a Cisco
Catalyst 3500XL switch at 100Mbps, full-duplex but I only get 15.6Mbps
throughput. I'm transferring ISO images from the FreeBSD machine to an NT
FTP server which is also connected on the same switch.
What's
21 matches
Mail list logo
