On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:35:00AM +, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> > I have seen this behavior before when one of the addresses on an interface =
> > is in a DMZ while the others are not. But this was with IPv4. I would assum=
> > e IPv6 would have acted the same way but left it untested as it was
> I have seen this behavior before when one of the addresses on an interface =
> is in a DMZ while the others are not. But this was with IPv4. I would assum=
> e IPv6 would have acted the same way but left it untested as it was not cri=
> tical. Take this as informational only and double check your
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 09:17:09AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> On 22. Dec 2011, at 20:39 , Marcin Cieslak wrote:
>
> >>> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >>> I initially thought it's a transport layer issue, since previously (before
> >>> I changed configuration) 30%-50% SSH connection attempts su
On 22. Dec 2011, at 20:39 , Marcin Cieslak wrote:
>>> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>> I initially thought it's a transport layer issue, since previously (before
>>> I changed configuration) 30%-50% SSH connection attempts succeeded
>>> (but prefix was wrong on the "primary" IPv6 address :1000).
>>> No
>> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> I initially thought it's a transport layer issue, since previously (before
>> I changed configuration) 30%-50% SSH connection attempts succeeded
>> (but prefix was wrong on the "primary" IPv6 address :1000).
>> Now I get no packets on receiving side at all for those "br
On 22. Dec 2011, at 18:01 , Marcin Cieslak wrote:
>>> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
>> to cut the long story short and before we try to debug this in detail;
>> if you try to reach all these addresses on the local machine, does that
>> work, eg. if you ping6 2001:abcd:f:abcd::100[0-5] from that host
>> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> to cut the long story short and before we try to debug this in detail;
> if you try to reach all these addresses on the local machine, does that work,
> eg. if you ping6 2001:abcd:f:abcd::100[0-5] from that host itself?
Yes,
$ ping6 2001:abcd:f:abcd::1003
PING6(56=4
On 22. Dec 2011, at 01:59 , Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I upgraded my Nov 2010 8.x-something machine to Dec 4th and later Dec 19th
> userland and kernel:
>
> FreeBSD x.saper.info 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Dec 19 22:13:54
> UTC 2011 r...@x.saper.info:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/
Hello,
I upgraded my Nov 2010 8.x-something machine to Dec 4th and later Dec 19th
userland and kernel:
FreeBSD x.saper.info 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Dec 19 22:13:54 UTC
2011 r...@x.saper.info:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/IPSEC amd64
Machine has 6 IPv6 addresses configured (out of pro
