On 07/22/2014 04:38 PM, 神明達哉 wrote:
>
>>> usually subjective, and different people may have different opinions.
>>> Personally, I often find "ping6 -w" quite useful for debugging
>>> purposes, and I think limiting its use to link-local by default gives
>>
>> Agreed. Perhaps we should enable it onl
At Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:35:22 -0700,
Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> > usually subjective, and different people may have different opinions.
> > Personally, I often find "ping6 -w" quite useful for debugging
> > purposes, and I think limiting its use to link-local by default gives
>
> Agreed. Perhap
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:25:37AM -0700, wrote:
> At Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:01:50 -0700,
> Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
>
> > > > Security Considerations
> > > >
> > > >This protocol has the potential of revealing information useful to a
> > > >would-be attacker. An implementation of
At Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:01:50 -0700,
Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> > > Security Considerations
> > >
> > >This protocol has the potential of revealing information useful to a
> > >would-be attacker. An implementation of this protocol MUST have a
> > >default configuration that refuse
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 09:53:13AM -0700, wrote:
> At Sun, 20 Jul 2014 02:04:10 -0700,
> Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
>
> > Security Considerations
> >
> >This protocol shares the security issues of ICMPv6 that are
> >documented in the "Security Considerations" section of [5].
> >
>
At Sun, 20 Jul 2014 02:04:10 -0700,
Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> Security Considerations
>
>This protocol shares the security issues of ICMPv6 that are
>documented in the "Security Considerations" section of [5].
>
>This protocol has the potential of revealing information useful to
Hi guys,
OpenBSD recently removed support for RFC 4620 from their kernel completely.
The default value is 3 in FreeBSD.
According to the RFC:
Security Considerations
This protocol shares the security issues of ICMPv6 that are
documented in the "Security Considerations" section of [5].
