https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746
Stefan Bethke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@lassitu.de
--- Comment #5 fro
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746
Thomas Steen Rasmussen / Tykling changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tho...@gibfest.d
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746
Nicolas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nico...@deffayet.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137089
Eitan Adler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Open
--- Comment #4 from Eitan Adler
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746
--- Comment #2 from Athanasios Douitsis ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1)
Running FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p11 #0: Mon Oct 24 18:49:24 UTC 2016
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 on both
nodes.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
Keywords|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|freebsd-am...@freebsd.org |
Assignee|freebsd-b...@fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137089
--- Comment #3 from xelah-freebs...@xelah.com ---
(In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #2)
The servers involved have long since been retired, so I no longer have a way to
test if it still happens.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137089
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hi...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
Krishna wrote:
Hi,
I am implementing a user space program to create and assign IPv6 address
to a linux host.
I am able to create and assign the IP successfully. But, if i am
assigning the duplicate address,
still the address gets assigned. I understand the kernel is handling the
DAD and repor
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Krishna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am implementing a user space program to create and assign IPv6 address to
> a linux host.
> I am able to create and assign the IP successfully. But, if i am assigning
> the duplicate address,
> still the address gets assigned. I understand
Hi,
I am implementing a user space program to create and assign IPv6 address
to a linux host.
I am able to create and assign the IP successfully. But, if i am
assigning the duplicate address,
still the address gets assigned. I understand the kernel is handling the
DAD and reporting to kernel l
Old Synopsis: lagg falsely triggers IPv6 duplicate address detection
New Synopsis: [lagg] lagg falsely triggers IPv6 duplicate address detection
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jul 25 01:08:36 UTC 2
Bob Van Zant wrote:
> Well that goes all the way back to my first email :-)
>
> "An alternative view on this is that I shouldn't be sending out any packets,
> especially unsolicited NAs, using or referencing a tentative address."
>
> This makes sense. I'll stop doing bad things now :-) Thanks for y
Well that goes all the way back to my first email :-)
"An alternative view on this is that I shouldn't be sending out any packets,
especially unsolicited NAs, using or referencing a tentative address."
This makes sense. I'll stop doing bad things now :-) Thanks for your input
and clearing this up
At Wed, 06 May 2009 17:17:52 -0700,
Bob Van Zant wrote:
> I guess that changes my question quite a bit. If you randomly fire off an
> unsolicited NA right after configuring an interface should that cause a DAD
> failure?
Actually, in that case you shouldn't send out the NA in the first
place bec
I never actually tested the NIC pairing scenario and was only testing the
naive "add a new IP, fire off an unsolicited NA for that IP."
I did just test the NIC pairing and you are right, if the interface is down
when it is configured we don't run DAD. Which does seem weird but that would
be a diff
At Wed, 06 May 2009 15:49:45 -0700,
Bob Van Zant wrote:
> > I'm afraid we need clarification first...what do you mean by
> > "reconfigure an interface with an IPv6 address"? Do you mean adding a
> > new IPv6 address to an interface? If so, I'm not sure why you
> > referred to the following part
On 5/6/09 3:06 PM, "JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉" wrote:
> I'm afraid we need clarification first...what do you mean by
> "reconfigure an interface with an IPv6 address"? Do you mean adding a
> new IPv6 address to an interface? If so, I'm not sure why you
> referred to the following part of RFC2461 (btw
At Tue, 05 May 2009 11:40:12 -0700,
Bob Van Zant wrote:
>
> I'm working on a piece of software that, among other things, allows an
> administrator to easily configure IPv6 interfaces on a FreeBSD host. I've
> run into a problem where whenever I reconfigure an interface with an IPv6
> address Free
On 5/6/09 7:27 AM, "Bruce Simpson" wrote:
>> The problem is that I'm following RFC 2461 [1] in that I send an unsolicited
>> neighbor advertisement to ff02::1 immediately after configuring the
>> interface.
>>
>
> How are you doing this? Do you do this from the kernel or from your own
> userl
Bob Van Zant wrote:
I'm working on a piece of software that, among other things, allows an
administrator to easily configure IPv6 interfaces on a FreeBSD host. I've
run into a problem where whenever I reconfigure an interface with an IPv6
address FreeBSD marks the new address as being a duplicate
I'm working on a piece of software that, among other things, allows an
administrator to easily configure IPv6 interfaces on a FreeBSD host. I've
run into a problem where whenever I reconfigure an interface with an IPv6
address FreeBSD marks the new address as being a duplicate.
The problem is that
24 matches
Mail list logo
