Re: IP_SENDSRCADDR implementation

2002-10-14 Thread Ian Dowse
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Silb ersack writes: > >I haven't looked at the implementation, but I think that it would be wise >to include the patch before 5.0-release so that there's a clear cutoff >where the feature became available. Ok - I'll see what the reaction here is first and then

Re: IP_SENDSRCADDR implementation

2002-10-14 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > Unfortunately it is relatively extensive. I've been running it for > about 4 months now, but that does not rule out the possibility of > bugs and unintended side-effects. Any comments, reviews or suggestions > welcome. Is this something that is useful enou

IP_SENDSRCADDR implementation

2002-10-14 Thread Ian Dowse
It was discussed here some time ago that we should have an IP_SENDSRCADDR ancillary data type to match the IP_RECVDSTADDR socket option. This permits a server process binding to a wildcard UDP socket to select the IP address from which outgoing packets are sent on a per-datagram basis. When combi