Re: IP_ONESBCAST and upcoming RELENG_4_9 freeze

2004-01-26 Thread Charles Swiger
On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 01:35 AM, Wes Peters wrote: On Thursday 21 August 2003 07:22 am, Bruce M Simpson wrote: Hi all, Does anyone have any major objections to an MFC'ing of IP_ONESBCAST which I committed yesterday before the upcoming 4.9 code freeze next Monday? No, please do-- your and W

Re: IP_ONESBCAST and upcoming RELENG_4_9 freeze

2003-10-19 Thread Wes Peters
On Thursday 21 August 2003 07:22 am, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone have any major objections to an MFC'ing of IP_ONESBCAST > which I committed yesterday before the upcoming 4.9 code freeze next > Monday? > > If you could let me know before, say, Saturday PM BST, that would be > g

Re: IP_ONESBCAST and upcoming RELENG_4_9 freeze

2003-08-22 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:35:03PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > Your change makes it so that broadcasts sent to 255.255.255.255 will > be transmitted on all interfaces marked with a ONES_BCAST flag, right? It really is a very simple addition. It's a protocol-level socket option, so doesn't interfe

IP_ONESBCAST and upcoming RELENG_4_9 freeze

2003-08-21 Thread Bruce M Simpson
Hi all, Does anyone have any major objections to an MFC'ing of IP_ONESBCAST which I committed yesterday before the upcoming 4.9 code freeze next Monday? If you could let me know before, say, Saturday PM BST, that would be great. Regards BMS ___ [EMAIL