Re: IPSec connection troubles

2010-02-23 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: Hi, On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:49:42PM +0300, Denis Antrushin wrote: On 02/23/10 15:21, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: [] Taking into account this quote: On 02/11/10 15:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Him saying it works on linux - has ipsec-tools grown

Re: IPSec connection troubles

2010-02-23 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:49:42PM +0300, Denis Antrushin wrote: > On 02/23/10 15:21, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: [] > Taking into account this quote: > > On 02/11/10 15:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > Him saying it works on linux - has ipsec-tools grown proper OA support > > these days? If that wou

Re: IPSec connection troubles

2010-02-23 Thread Denis Antrushin
On 02/23/10 15:21, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:10:23PM +0300, Denis Antrushin wrote: [...] ipsec-tools understand NAT-OA payload in IKE exchange, but then simply discard it and do not send this information to kernel. In ipsec-tool mailing list archives I found mention that

Re: IPSec connection troubles

2010-02-23 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:10:23PM +0300, Denis Antrushin wrote: [...] > ipsec-tools understand NAT-OA payload in IKE exchange, but then simply > discard it and do not send this information to kernel. > In ipsec-tool mailing list archives I found mention that linux does not > need this OA info, bec

Re: IPSec connection troubles

2010-02-23 Thread Denis Antrushin
On 02/11/10 15:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: How can I further debug this problem? You can check on responder that you have lots of TCP checksums errors, which will confirm that you would need support for NAT-OA extension of NAT-T RFC, as you want to d

Re: IPSec connection troubles

2010-02-11 Thread Denis Antrushin
On 02/11/10 15:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: How can I further debug this problem? You can check on responder that you have lots of TCP checksums errors, which will confirm that you would need support for NAT-OA extension of NAT-T RFC, as you want to d

Re: IPSec connection troubles

2010-02-11 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: Hi, I'm trying to establish IPSec connection between FreeBSD and Solaris boxes. I use FreeBSD 8-STABLE (don't recall exact checkout date, but it contains recent IPComp fixes for sure). Since I'm behind NAT, I compiled 0.8alpha snapshot of ipsec-tools

Re: IPSec connection troubles

2010-02-11 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:24:50PM +0300, Denis Antrushin wrote: > Hello, Hi. > I'm trying to establish IPSec connection between FreeBSD and > Solaris boxes. I use FreeBSD 8-STABLE (don't recall exact checkout > date, but it contains recent IPComp fixes for sure). > Since I'm behind NAT, I compi

IPSec connection troubles

2010-02-11 Thread Denis Antrushin
Hello, I'm trying to establish IPSec connection between FreeBSD and Solaris boxes. I use FreeBSD 8-STABLE (don't recall exact checkout date, but it contains recent IPComp fixes for sure). Since I'm behind NAT, I compiled 0.8alpha snapshot of ipsec-tools from their site. racoon config looks like