Re: IPSEC NAT traversal

2009-05-07 Thread Gabe
--- On Wed, 5/6/09, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Wed, 6 May 2009, Gabe wrote: > > Hi, > > I had been travelling yesterday, ... here is the summary > for today: > > > So how is it coming along? > > It's compiling; it's on might notebook since last > night as well. It > hasn't crashed yet. I hav

Re: IPSEC NAT traversal

2009-05-06 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Gabe wrote: Hi, I had been travelling yesterday, ... here is the summary for today: So how is it coming along? It's compiling; it's on might notebook since last night as well. It hasn't crashed yet. I haven't tested IPsec yet either though;) That'll probably happen the ne

Re: IPSEC NAT traversal

2009-05-06 Thread Gabe
--- On Tue, 4/28/09, Scott Ullrich wrote: > From: Scott Ullrich > Subject: Re: IPSEC NAT traversal > To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "VANHULLEBUS Yvan" > Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 11:39 AM > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Bjoer

Re: IPSEC NAT traversal

2009-04-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Scott Ullrich wrote: [snip] > I have NAT-T on top of that. And I am currently doing the whatever > you'll call it 'final pass', will send it back to Yvan once I am done > with the last 2 items and last 400 lines of key.c

Re: IPSEC NAT traversal

2009-04-28 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Scott Ullrich wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:07 AM, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: See recent archives, there is actually an issue with the patchset, as there are no more available bits in struct inp's flags. We're working on that to find and implement the best solution. Hi,

Re: IPSEC NAT traversal

2009-04-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:07 AM, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: > See recent archives, there is actually an issue with the patchset, as > there are no more available bits in struct inp's flags. > We're working on that to find and implement the best solution. Hi, Ermal Luci recently whipped the pfSense'

Re: IPSEC NAT traversal

2009-04-28 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:08:24PM +0200, Giulio Ferro wrote: > What's the status of NATT patch in 8 current? Is it usable? Hi. See recent archives, there is actually an issue with the patchset, as there are no more available bits in struct inp's flags. We're working on that to find and implement

IPSEC NAT traversal

2009-04-28 Thread Giulio Ferro
What's the status of NATT patch in 8 current? Is it usable? Thanks. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"