;> Many thanks!
>>
>> I successfully apply this patch
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/patch-natt-7.2-2009-05-12.diff on
>> FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE and build custom kernel with IPSec NAT-T support. I
>> use ipse
AT-T/patch-natt-7.2-2009-05-12.diff on
> FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE and build custom kernel with IPSec NAT-T support. I
> use ipsec-tools 0.7.3 and it works coorectly.
>
> Thanks again.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
Many thanks!
I successfully apply this patch
http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/patch-natt-7.2-2009-05-12.diff on
FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE and build custom kernel with IPSec NAT-T support. I use
ipsec-tools 0.7.3 and it works coorectly.
Thanks again
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:59:05AM +0300, Denis Antrushin wrote:
> On 03/24/10 10:14, Oleg Fedorov wrote:
> >If exist some IPSec NAT-T patch for FreeBSD 7.3?
>
> There is patch for 7.2 here:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/
Basically, those patchsets will work w
On 03/24/10 10:14, Oleg Fedorov wrote:
If exist some IPSec NAT-T patch for FreeBSD 7.3?
There is patch for 7.2 here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/
This short thread is worth reading also:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-net@freebsd.org/msg30675.html
(ipsec-tools 0.7.3 is
If exist some IPSec NAT-T patch for FreeBSD 7.3?
Thanks.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
- Original Message
> From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
> To: Gabe
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Sent: Tue, November 3, 2009 2:41:14 AM
> Subject: Re: IPSEC NAT-T
>
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:00:30AM -0800, Gabe wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi.
>
>
> &g
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:00:30AM -0800, Gabe wrote:
> Hello,
Hi.
> What's the latest "stable" patch available for the latest 7.x source?
Stable patches, to be used with ipsec-tools 0.7 branch, are available
here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/
As we're working on backporting FreeBSD
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:00, nrml@ wrote:
Hello,
What's the latest "stable" patch available for the latest 7.x source?
thanks
Checkout http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/7 (Subversion Repository)
You can also browse back to the root of that tree to get to the ViewVC
client to browse t
Hello,
What's the latest "stable" patch available for the latest 7.x source?
thanks
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>From Larry:
> >> I'm interesting FAST_IPSEC support:-).
> >
> > if Larry or someone else have quickly some time to do it, please let
> > me know.
> >
> > If no one else port that (it shouldn't be too difficult, but takes
> > some time), I'll do it "ASAP".
> I'll make the time. Should
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 06:02:38AM +0600, Kamanashis Roy Shuva wrote:
> Hi,
> You have done a great jop. And I find this useful today. Problem is things
> are not working fine.
> I have compiled freebsd with the patch
> MD5 (freebsd6-natt.diff) = 81d535363981b5e84be77cbf26918ccc
> for natt suppor
>> I'm interesting FAST_IPSEC support:-).
>
> if Larry or someone else have quickly some time to do it, please let
> me know.
>
> If no one else port that (it shouldn't be too difficult, but takes
> some time), I'll do it "ASAP".
I'll make the time. Should have something in the next da
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 08:31:47PM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:01:35 +0200
[NAT-T patches]
> > - The public patch (A) works for IPSEC, and should apply on both
> > RELENG_6 and RELENG_6_1 (some minor patching issues may need to be
> > solved by hand, but it's just
:45:45 2005
+++ sys/netinet/udp.h Sat Sep 9 19:56:15 2006
@@ -44,4 +44,17 @@
u_short uh_sum; /* udp checksum */
};
+/* socket options for UDP */
+#define UDP_ENCAP 100
+
+/* Encapsulation types */
+#define UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP_NON_IKE 1 /* draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-i
Hi.
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:59:47PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 9/4/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Are you sure this is a clean RELENG_6_1 with the correct patch?
> >MD5 (freebsd6-natt.diff) = 5e7bb5a3203c8959928bf910d5498140
>
> Yes it was a clean RELENG_6_1.
>
> >I co
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 9/4/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the patch only support kame ipsec. I guess that's the problem. Could
you try it building with kame ipsec instead of fast_ipsec and let us
know if that worked?
That may work okay but then would I loos
On 9/4/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the patch only support kame ipsec. I guess that's the problem. Could
you try it building with kame ipsec instead of fast_ipsec and let us
know if that worked?
That may work okay but then would I loose HIFN support, etc?
Scott
___
On 9/4/06, Eric Masson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yvan's patch addresses NATT only with KAME stack.
He's been talking about work in progress regarding NATT support with
FAST_IPSEC on ipsec-tools-devel.
Thanks for the clarification. I look forward to when this works with
FAST_IPSEC as well :
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Maybe it is because I am including FAST_IPSEC? I have attempted to
build and use a NAT-T kernel on atleast 7 attempts now. Last of which
was a couple months ago.
the patch only support kame ipsec. I guess that's the problem. Could
you try it building
"Scott Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> Maybe it is because I am including FAST_IPSEC? I have attempted to
> build and use a NAT-T kernel on atleast 7 attempts now. Last of which
> was a couple months ago.
Yvan's patch addresses NATT only with KAME stack.
He's been talking about wo
On 9/4/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you sure this is a clean RELENG_6_1 with the correct patch?
MD5 (freebsd6-natt.diff) = 5e7bb5a3203c8959928bf910d5498140
Yes it was a clean RELENG_6_1.
I compiled this on i386 and am64 just a few days ago and everything
was fine.
Perhap
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 9/4/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It does apply and compile to RELENG_6_1 and RELENG_6 of some days ago
(unless you do not enable the option after applying the patch).
At least it did for me.
I am partly fine with the "does not work" (
On 9/4/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It does apply and compile to RELENG_6_1 and RELENG_6 of some days ago
(unless you do not enable the option after applying the patch).
At least it did for me.
I am partly fine with the "does not work" (in all cases). I am
currently debugging thi
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 9/4/06, Norikatsu Shigemura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm finding IPSec NAT-Traversal support patch for 6-stable and
7-current. But I could only find it for 6.0-R and 4-stable:-(.
Where is IPSec NAT-T su
On 9/4/06, Norikatsu Shigemura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm finding IPSec NAT-Traversal support patch for 6-stable and
7-current. But I could only find it for 6.0-R and 4-stable:-(.
Where is IPSec NAT-T support patch?
And why does IPSec NAT-T
I'm finding IPSec NAT-Traversal support patch for 6-stable and
7-current. But I could only find it for 6.0-R and 4-stable:-(.
Where is IPSec NAT-T support patch?
And why does IPSec NAT-T support be comitted into src tree?
NetBSD already supports IPSe
27 matches
Mail list logo
