Re: An IPFW problem when going from release to stable on 8.2/ Maybe bge0 network card?

On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Dave Johnson wrote: > Hi all > > > An IPFW problem when going from release to stable on 8.2 > > An help gladly accepted > > LOG ON > > Flushed all rules. > 00010 allow ip from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1 via lo0 > 00030 div

An IPFW problem when going from release to stable on 8.2/ Maybe bge0 network card?

Hi all An IPFW problem when going from release to stable on 8.2 An help gladly accepted LOG ON Flushed all rules. 00010 allow ip from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1 via lo0 00030 divert 8668 ip from any to any via bge0 ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument 5 allow ip from any to any

Re: Multiple Routing Tables (FIB) + IPFW problem as (I?) expected

obviously you did some other commands here.. something generated 2 million packets.. Julian, its a production enviroment, firewall was up for a few minutes. Thats the reason. I was thinking of adding a 'reroute' ipfw keyword.. kind of like 'fwd {original dest} ip from any to any' because 'fwd'

Re: Multiple Routing Tables (FIB) + IPFW problem as (I?) expected

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Luiz Otavio O Souza wrote: >>> obviously you did some other commands here.. >>> something generated 2 million packets.. >> >> Julian, its a production enviroment, firewall was up for a few >> minutes. Thats the reason. >> >>> I was thinking of adding a 'reroute' ip

Re: Multiple Routing Tables (FIB) + IPFW problem as (I?) expected

obviously you did some other commands here.. something generated 2 million packets.. Julian, its a production enviroment, firewall was up for a few minutes. Thats the reason. I was thinking of adding a 'reroute' ipfw keyword.. kind of like 'fwd {original dest} ip from any to any' because 'fwd'

Re: Multiple Routing Tables (FIB) + IPFW problem as (I?) expected

> obviously you did some other commands here.. > something generated 2 million packets.. Julian, its a production enviroment, firewall was up for a few minutes. Thats the reason. > I was thinking of adding a 'reroute' ipfw keyword.. kind of like > 'fwd {original dest} ip from any to any' > becaus

Re: Multiple Routing Tables (FIB) + IPFW problem as (I?) expected

Eduardo Meyer wrote: Hello, I am trying the new FIB stuff on -STABLE with IPFW, I made many tests and it did not work as I expected. Quick testing: # lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org 200.165.75.10 # setfib -1 lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org 189.52.141.2 # setfib -2 lynx -dump http:/

Re: Multiple Routing Tables (FIB) + IPFW problem as (I?) expected

Hello, I am trying the new FIB stuff on -STABLE with IPFW, I made many tests and it did not work as I expected. Quick testing: # lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org 200.165.75.10 # setfib -1 lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org 189.52.141.2 # setfib -2 lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org 20

Multiple Routing Tables (FIB) + IPFW problem as (I?) expected

Hello, I am trying the new FIB stuff on -STABLE with IPFW, I made many tests and it did not work as I expected. Quick testing: # lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org 200.165.75.10 # setfib -1 lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org 189.52.141.2 # setfib -2 lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org 201

Re: IPFW problem

You need to reconsider the entire ruleset. Begin with a structured ruleset such as the following and build from there. Use a discrete ruleset for the router host. check-state allow ip from me to any keep-state deny ip from me to any allow icmp from any to me icmptypes 3,4,8,11 keep-state den

Re: IPFW problem

Dave Johnson wrote: > Hi all > > I am having a problem with ipfw. > > Please have a look at www.pastebin.com/597707 > > I could not ping anything so I hashed out line 62 & 70 > > Now I can ping 192.168.0.2 but not 192.168.0.1. > > Also browsing and email is not working. Um. Your IPFW rule

IPFW problem

Hi all I am having a problem with ipfw. Please have a look at www.pastebin.com/597707 I could not ping anything so I hashed out line 62 & 70 Now I can ping 192.168.0.2 but not 192.168.0.1. Also browsing and email is not working. Thanks Regards _