Re: IP options (was: Processing IP options reveals IPSTEALH router)

2001-12-22 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Hi, Yar, On 19:12+0300, Dec 21, 2001, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 01:24:48AM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > > > > Neither RFC 791 nor RFC 1122 nor RFC 1812 specify the following: > > > if a source-routed IP packet reachs the end of its route, but its > > > destination address

Re: IP options (was: Processing IP options reveals IPSTEALH router)

2001-12-22 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 01:24:48AM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > > Neither RFC 791 nor RFC 1122 nor RFC 1812 specify the following: > > if a source-routed IP packet reachs the end of its route, but its > > destination address doesn't match a current host/router, whether > > the packet should

Re: IP options (was: Processing IP options reveals IPSTEALH router)

2001-12-19 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Morning, On 00:35+0300, Dec 20, 2001, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:54:50PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > > > By the way, is it correct to forward the packet with incorrect ip > > options? Now we do not. > > No RFC seems to specify that particularly. However, RFC 1812 read

IP options (was: Processing IP options reveals IPSTEALH router)

2001-12-19 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:54:50PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > By the way, is it correct to forward the packet with incorrect ip > options? Now we do not. No RFC seems to specify that particularly. However, RFC 1812 reads in general: (1) A router MUST verify the IP header, as describe