Re: How to support QUIC with ipfw

2021-04-12 Thread Matt Joras
Hi Michael, On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 2:27 PM Michael Sierchio wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 2:20 PM Matt Joras wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021, 1:25 PM Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > >> Hi, all. I noticed my firewall was dropping what seemed to be unsolicited > >> UDP

Re: How to support QUIC with ipfw

2021-04-11 Thread Michael Sierchio
Sadly, no. That would be a great feature. The sysctl setting for dynamic rule lifetime is for all UDP. But since the firewall itself is responsible for most of the DNS and NTP traffic, I can write non-stateful rules for that. The recursive resolver on that port won't respond to outside queries

Re: How to support QUIC with ipfw

2021-04-11 Thread Michael Sierchio
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 2:20 PM Matt Joras wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021, 1:25 PM Michael Sierchio wrote: > >> Hi, all. I noticed my firewall was dropping what seemed to be unsolicited >> UDP connections from Google and Facebook, but this turned out to be QUIC >> traffic. The tr

Re: How to support QUIC with ipfw

2021-04-11 Thread Matt Joras
Hi Michael, On Sun, Apr 11, 2021, 1:25 PM Michael Sierchio wrote: > Hi, all. I noticed my firewall was dropping what seemed to be unsolicited > UDP connections from Google and Facebook, but this turned out to be QUIC > traffic. The traffic can be initiated by the browser (or other supporting >

How to support QUIC with ipfw

2021-04-11 Thread Michael Sierchio
Hi, all. I noticed my firewall was dropping what seemed to be unsolicited UDP connections from Google and Facebook, but this turned out to be QUIC traffic. The traffic can be initiated by the browser (or other supporting software) or the server. The problem is that dynamic rules generally don't c