On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but didn't think this was doable ...
Why not:
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.2/24
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.2/24 alias
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.10/32 alias
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.5/32 alias
ifco
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> but didn't think this was doable ...
> > Why not:
> > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.2/24
> > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.2/24 alias
> > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.10/32 alias
> > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.5/32 alias
> > ifconfig fxp0 i
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
ng_fec is the NetGraph module which implements Cisco FastEtherChannel
technology. This actually means you have 1 virtual interface fec0
representing 2 or more physical interfaces. The load balancing scheme
can be assigned by a Catalyst, bu
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
ng_fec is the NetGraph module which implements Cisco FastEtherChannel
technology. This actually means you have 1 virtual interface fec0
representing 2 or more physical interfaces. The load balancing scheme
can be assigned by a Catalyst, but low-end models like 29
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but didn't think this was doable ...
Why not:
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.2/24
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.2/24 alias
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.10/32 alias
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.5/32 alias
ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.254/32 alias
ifconf
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
> > This actually means you have 1 virtual interface fec0 representing 2 or
> > more physical interfaces. The load balancing scheme can be assigned by a
> > Catalyst, but low-end models like 2950 and 3550 can only balance traffic
> > based on the least signific
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Nikolay Kryukov wrote:
It's the case of incorrect configuration. Equal mac addresses must not
exist in different ports on the same vlan on catalyst switches. They may
cause problems like:
'k, now I'm confused ... I hadn't noticed that, but how is it that they
are 'equal'? I
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
This actually means you have 1 virtual interface fec0 representing 2 or
more physical interfaces. The load balancing scheme can be assigned by a
Catalyst, but low-end models like 2950 and 3550 can only balance traffic
based on the least significant bit(s) of MAC-
It's the case of incorrect configuration. Equal mac addresses must not exist in
different ports on the same vlan on catalyst switches. They may cause
problems like:
http://www.ciscotaccc.com/lanswitching/showcase?case=K19174025
and, consequently, high latency.
MGF> Testing my network, I just notic
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
>
>>> I'm plugging everything into a Cisco 2924 ... is there some way, either on
>>> the FreeBSD side, or Cisco, of 'cleaning this up'?
>>
>> Try ng_fec. It works ok with 2950, not sure about 2924 though.
>
> man page is a bit short ... what exactly is ng_fec, a
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
I'm plugging everything into a Cisco 2924 ... is there some way, either on
the FreeBSD side, or Cisco, of 'cleaning this up'?
Try ng_fec. It works ok with 2950, not sure about 2924 though.
man page is a bit short ... what exactly is ng_fec, and how does it affect
t
> Testing my network, I just noticed the following:
>
> --- 200.46.204.1 ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 399.664/407.119/420.315/8.267 ms
>
> --- 200.46.208.1 ping statistics ---
> 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets r
Testing my network, I just noticed the following:
--- 200.46.204.1 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 399.664/407.119/420.315/8.267 ms
--- 200.46.208.1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet
13 matches
Mail list logo
