On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:51:11 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Ian Smith wrote:
>
O. Hartmann wrote:
> > > But that is an other issue and it is most likely
> > > due to the outdated documentation (that doc still uses port 37 for NTP
> > > purposes and referes to the ou
Am Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:08:51 +1000 (EST)
Ian Smith schrieb:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:47:57 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:21:21 +0300
> > Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hopefully, I'm right on this
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Ian Smith wrote:
> But that is an other issue and it is most likely
> due to the outdated documentation (that doc still uses port 37 for NTP
> purposes and referes to the outdated divert mechanism using natd, see the
> recent handbook). The internet is also full of ambigous
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:47:57 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:21:21 +0300
> Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann
> > wrote:
> > > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward.
> > >
> > > Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 1
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:59:15 +0300
Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>
>
> 15.09.2015, 10:48, "O. Hartmann" :
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:21:21 +0300
> > Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, pl
15.09.2015, 10:48, "O. Hartmann" :
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:21:21 +0300
> Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>> > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward.
>> >
>> > Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r287780: Mon
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:21:21 +0300
Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
> > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward.
> >
> > Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r287780: Mon Sep 14 13:34:16
> > CEST 2015 amd64, I check via nm
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:13:33 -0700
Xin Li wrote:
>
>
> On 9/15/15 00:06, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward.
> >
> > Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r287780: Mon Sep 14 13:34:16
> > CEST 2015 amd64, I check via nmap for open sockets
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward.
>
> Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r287780: Mon Sep 14 13:34:16
> CEST 2015 amd64, I check via nmap for open sockets since I had trouble
> protecting a server with IPFW
On 9/15/15 00:06, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward.
>
> Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r287780: Mon Sep 14 13:34:16
> CEST 2015 amd64, I check via nmap for open sockets since I had trouble
> protecting a server with IPFW and NAT.
>
>
Hopefully, I'm right on this list. if not, please forward.
Running CURRENT as of FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r287780: Mon Sep 14 13:34:16
CEST 2015 amd64, I check via nmap for open sockets since I had trouble
protecting a server with IPFW and NAT.
I see a service (nmap)
Host is up (0.041s latency).
11 matches
Mail list logo