Re: HEADS UP: INET dependencies in the kernel

2009-06-11 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: This is kind of a heads up that from the time 8 will be branched off and HEAD will be 9 all new code should 1) have feature parity for INET and INET6 where applicable As a sort of side-note, what about feature parity for INET6 for existing IPV4 features like TSO? Who is

HEADS UP: INET dependencies in the kernel

2009-06-11 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
Hi, over the last days I fixed a few places missing #ifdef INET as well changed the kernel build file in sys/conf/files and added depencies for those parts that really require INET to compile / work at the moment. WARNING: This means for example if you build a k