I can't believe it but I managed to do this:
Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff [2016-06-08 18:30 +0200] :
> Then, I could use devd to assign the public failover IP (that I actually
> wanted to share with CARP on vtnet0) to the public interface vtnet0.
> CARP(4) provides an example on how to use carp s
Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff [2016-06-08 18:30 +0200] :
> Then, I could use devd to assign the public failover IP (that I actually
> wanted to share with CARP on vtnet0) to the public interface vtnet0.
> CARP(4) provides an example on how to use carp status change events for
> additional scripting
Matthew Grooms [2016-06-08 11:02 -0500] :
> Rewriting the multicast destination would be a neat trick, but sadly no.
> You can't rewrite a destination address on egress. Using a route-to rule
> would only modify the destination MAC address. If you were using
> OpenBSD, you would switch from mul
On 6/8/2016 10:15 AM, David DeSimone wrote:
One of the purposes of the CARP announcements is to announce the
location of the virtual mac address to the upstream switch fabric.
Since CARP uses a virtual mac that floats between multiple ports, you
need to have the CARP master continually assert tha
Hi Niklaas,
Rewriting the multicast destination would be a neat trick, but sadly no.
You can't rewrite a destination address on egress. Using a route-to rule
would only modify the destination MAC address. If you were using
OpenBSD, you would switch from multicast to unicast using the syncpeer
freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 7:43 AM
To: freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Getting CARP to broadcast on a different interface
Hello,
is it possible to configure CARP in such a way that it sends its
broadcasts
Trond Endrestøl [2016-06-08 15:53 +0200] :
> Although it sounds pretty bad, you could set up CARP on the internal
> network and use those CARP events to control the main interfaces, e.g.
> re-adjust their annoncement intervals, or something equally awful.
Thanks, Trond. As you said, not that it
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:43+0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible to configure CARP in such a way that it sends its
> broadcasts on an interface different from the one that gets the shared
> IP address assigned? Unfortunately, my provider blocks broadcast and
> multic
Hello,
is it possible to configure CARP in such a way that it sends its
broadcasts on an interface different from the one that gets the shared
IP address assigned? Unfortunately, my provider blocks broadcast and
multicast on public interfaces of virtual machines.
However, they offer to set up an
