Am 30.05.2018 um 10:43 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij:
Most likely threading only part of problem with iperf3.
As I say before - I'm check iperf3 in paralel by running multiple instanse on
diferent's ports
Speed is always same.
But maybe 2-3 instance to few for noticible result's.
For me most co
Most likely threading only part of problem with iperf3.
As I say before - I'm check iperf3 in paralel by running multiple instanse on
diferent's ports
Speed is always same.
But maybe 2-3 instance to few for noticible result's.
For me most confusion was speed aroud 10Gbit on pure link showed
Am 29.05.2018 um 16:02 schrieb Rodney W. Grimes:
Am 29.05.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij:
MM> Can you try MTU 1400 on GRE0 and MSS of 1300 just for testing?
MM> With this values I get 4600Mbit sending and 1400Mbit receiving with
MM> iperf and 10 parallel streams.
MM>
UUUPSS looks lik
> Am 29.05.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij:
>
> MM> Can you try MTU 1400 on GRE0 and MSS of 1300 just for testing?
> MM> With this values I get 4600Mbit sending and 1400Mbit receiving with
> MM> iperf and 10 parallel streams.
> MM>
>
> UUUPSS looks like i have problem with metodology
Am 29.05.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij:
MM> Can you try MTU 1400 on GRE0 and MSS of 1300 just for testing?
MM> With this values I get 4600Mbit sending and 1400Mbit receiving with
MM> iperf and 10 parallel streams.
MM>
UUUPSS looks like i have problem with metodology
I'm use iperf3
Am 29.05.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij:
AVE>
AVE> So, is there no difference at all? The same bit rate with and without
AVE> loaded module? Can you share your configs and parameters used for testing?
KERNEL - GENERIC
No additional config in src.conf make.conf, no sysct.conf or anyt
AVE>
AVE> So, is there no difference at all? The same bit rate with and without
AVE> loaded module? Can you share your configs and parameters used for testing?
KERNEL - GENERIC
No additional config in src.conf make.conf, no sysct.conf or anything else in
configs
1) no module
mtu on ixl - 15
On 29.05.2018 13:58, Vitalij Satanivskij wrote:
> Thank you Andrey.
>
> I'm test with value of 62 without any success ^(
So, is there no difference at all? The same bit rate with and without
loaded module? Can you share your configs and parameters used for testing?
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Thank you Andrey.
I'm test with value of 62 without any success ^(
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
AVE> On 29.05.2018 13:05, Vitalij Satanivskij wrote:
AVE> >
AVE> > Hello.
AVE> >
AVE> > Looks like it's inposible to set as sysctl are readonly and through
loader.conf it's also not setable.
AVE> >
On 29.05.2018 13:05, Vitalij Satanivskij wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Looks like it's inposible to set as sysctl are readonly and through
> loader.conf it's also not setable.
>
> AVE> You can try to increase kern.ipc.max_linkhdr up to 60-80 bytes.
> AVE> I think this can increase throughput a bit, sin
Hello.
Looks like it's inposible to set as sysctl are readonly and through loader.conf
it's also not setable.
AVE> You can try to increase kern.ipc.max_linkhdr up to 60-80 bytes.
AVE> I think this can increase throughput a bit, since this can reduce the
AVE> need to allocate extra mbuf when ne
On 29.05.2018 10:17, Vitalij Satanivskij wrote:
> Version of system - 11.2-BETA2 FreeBSD 11.2-BETA2 #0 r334027
> Also I'm test FreeBSD 11.1-PRERELEASE #6 r320593
>
> Kernel GENERIC and CUSTOM (mostly cut off not used drivers from kernel)
>
> For testing I'm use iperf on pure 10Gbit chanel easy g
Hello.
Trying to build a tunnel between two machines with 10Gbit network (ixl0:
)
I saw that the maximum speed of the tunnel is 1.6gbit for gre/gif and arround
544-600mbit for ng0 (netgraph tunnel via TCP)
Hardware is:
CPU: AMD EPYC 7251 8-Core Processor
FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 8 core
13 matches
Mail list logo
