Re: FreeVRRPD problem

2004-06-30 Thread Sten Spans
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Bruno Afonso wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to have failover with a couple boxes and they're basically > doing NAT and firewalling. 1 box has a couple fxp and the other a couple > rls. Is this supposed to be a problem for freevrrpd? > > Only fxp box actually can use the fail-o

Re: FreeVRRPD problem

2004-06-28 Thread Bruno Afonso
Sebastien Petit wrote: Hi Bruno, Perhaps rls interfaces doesn't support monitored circuits. Try to add this option : monitoredcircuits = no If this does not work, try to set useVMAC to no and sendgratuitousarp to yes. Ok, disabling monitoredcircuits seems to be working fine. I'll do some more expe

Re: FreeVRRPD problem

2004-06-27 Thread Sebastien Petit
o" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 6:35 AM Subject: FreeVRRPD problem > Hello, > > I'm trying to have failover with a couple boxes and they're basically > doing NAT and firewalling. 1 box

Re: FreeVRRPD problem

2004-06-26 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi, You may also want to look at CARP from OpenBSD. Check http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1021 for more informations. Also, http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/carp.html is a FreeBSD port of CARP, but the DNS entry does not seem to exist any longer Regards, -- Jeremie LE HEN aka TtZ/TataZ

FreeVRRPD problem

2004-06-23 Thread Bruno Afonso
Hello, I'm trying to have failover with a couple boxes and they're basically doing NAT and firewalling. 1 box has a couple fxp and the other a couple rls. Is this supposed to be a problem for freevrrpd? Only fxp box actually can use the fail-over ips. The backup box cannot use them if we start