Re: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Randy Bush
On 08.12.17 03:11, Bruce Simpson wrote: Randy Bush wrote: ... freebsd does not allow metrics on static routes, which would be the 'normal' hack. i.e. you can not have two default routes with different weights. If you look in my 1 currently owned PRs: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=

RE: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On > Behalf Of Gabe > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:14 AM > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: FreeBSD network failover > > >Maybe try lagg(4) in

Re: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Bruce Simpson
Randy Bush wrote: ... freebsd does not allow metrics on static routes, which would be the 'normal' hack. i.e. you can not have two default routes with different weights. If you look in my 1 currently owned PRs: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/71474 ...this ticket contains

Re: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Shteryana Shopova
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Gabe wrote: >>Maybe try lagg(4) in Failover mode? > Lagg wouldn't work on my setup because the dsl connection would be almost > completely independent. Unless you can provide an example. > Bind the two connection to the lagg, configure both IPs on the lagg and

Re: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Nikolay Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 16 Dec, 2008, at 11:56 , Gabe wrote: I have a nat'd box which obviously has an internal and external ip address. The box has a third interface which is configured to a DSL connection. My goal is for that interface to be activated if the ext

Re: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Valentin Bud
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Gabe wrote: > >Maybe try lagg(4) in Failover mode? > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > I have a nat'd box which obviously has an internal and external ip > address. The box has a third interface which is configured to a > DSL

RE: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Gabe
>Maybe try lagg(4) in Failover mode? On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Randy Bush wrote: I have a nat'd box which obviously has an internal and external ip address. The box has a third interface which is configured to a DSL connection. My goal is for that interface to be activated

Re: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Shteryana Shopova
Maybe try lagg(4) in Failover mode? On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Randy Bush wrote: I have a nat'd box which obviously has an internal and external ip address. The box has a third interface which is configured to a DSL connection. My goal is for that interface to be activated i

Re: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Randy Bush
I have a nat'd box which obviously has an internal and external ip address. The box has a third interface which is configured to a DSL connection. My goal is for that interface to be activated if the external side fails so that outbound traffic still flows. Any of you know of a way to accomplish t

RE: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Gabe
On 08.12.16 18:56, Gabe wrote: > I have a nat'd box which obviously has an internal and external ip > address. The box has a third interface which is configured to a DSL > connection. My goal is for that interface to be activated if the > external side fails so that outbound traffic still flows. An

Re: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Randy Bush
On 08.12.16 18:56, Gabe wrote: I have a nat'd box which obviously has an internal and external ip address. The box has a third interface which is configured to a DSL connection. My goal is for that interface to be activated if the external side fails so that outbound traffic still flows. Any of y

FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Gabe
I have a nat'd box which obviously has an internal and external ip address. The box has a third interface which is configured to a DSL connection. My goal is for that interface to be activated if the external side fails so that outbound traffic still flows. Any of you know of a way to accomplish