> > > Internet ettiquette demands being gracious in what you accept.
> > > The default policy of FreeBSD is to accept such packets.
> > > This is a really weird bug to track down.
> > > Other drivers support it.
> > >
> > > This isn't worth making a stand over, unless you're trying
> > > to hold u
* David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070907 13:41] wrote:
> > > I'm not completely opposed to making such a change, but I don't want
> > > to make a default change in the driver's behavior that other people
> > > may be depending upon (whether they are aware of it or not). A
> > > tunable dri
> > I'm not completely opposed to making such a change, but I don't want
> > to make a default change in the driver's behavior that other people
> > may be depending upon (whether they are aware of it or not). A
> > tunable driver value could be the answer but I'm not entirely sure
> > how it wou
* David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070907 10:48] wrote:
> > > It could certainly be argued by some that Cisco is not standards
> > > compliant in this case for sending an oversized Ethernet frame
> > > and expecting everyone to accept it. Hardware has limitations
> > > and assuming that all
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Why not set the mtu on the net and host routes to 1500 to make it all
work? I forget if my route mtu code is in 6.2, but it'll be in 7.0...
I think it is..
took us ages to figure out why some client machines hit this and
others didn't. turned out that there were MTUs
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote this message on Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 18:14 -0700:
David Christensen wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Ok which clever person did this again?
It just broke our product.
If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just
about to be...
on the
> > It could certainly be argued by some that Cisco is not standards
> > compliant in this case for sending an oversized Ethernet frame
> > and expecting everyone to accept it. Hardware has limitations
> > and assuming that all Ethernet controllers can support frames
> > greater than 1522 bytes is
Julian Elischer wrote this message on Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 18:14 -0700:
> David Christensen wrote:
> >>Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>>Ok which clever person did this again?
> >>>
> >>>It just broke our product.
> >>>If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just
> >>about to be...
> >>
> >>
David Christensen wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Ok which clever person did this again?
It just broke our product.
If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just
about to be...
on the topic above, I've found that the bce driver seems to
be throwingaway packets
larger than the mtu
On 9/6/07, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. I've already said (multiple times): nuke the code.
Oops - faulty memory - brain too small.
-Kip
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To
Kip Macy wrote:
On 9/6/07, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok which clever person did this again?
It just broke our product.
If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just about to be...
Talk to Sam. I think we added a flag for LRO, may want something more general
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Ok which clever person did this again?
> >
> > It just broke our product.
> > If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just
> about to be...
>
>
> on the topic above, I've found that the bce driver seems to
> be throwingaway packets
> larger than the mtu
Julian Elischer wrote:
Ok which clever person did this again?
It just broke our product.
If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just about to be...
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
On 9/6/07, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok which clever person did this again?
>
> It just broke our product.
> If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just about to be...
Talk to Sam. I think we added a flag for LRO, may want something more general.
-Kip
___
Ok which clever person did this again?
It just broke our product.
If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just about to be...
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send
15 matches
Mail list logo
