Holiday Treats for you! win 89$

2017-01-08 Thread UGG Australia Boots
___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

For you

2015-08-25 Thread Sergey Tyshchenko
for you

Re: does "nat redirect_port tcp" works for you on -CURRENT?

2015-02-04 Thread Ian Smith
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 02:14:41 +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > On 05.02.2015 01:16, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > > I have such rules in my firewall: > > > > nat 9 config redirect_port tcp 192.168.134.2:16881 16881 > > redirect_port udp 192.158.134.2:16881 16881 redirect_port tcp > > 192.168.134

Re: does "nat redirect_port tcp" works for you on -CURRENT?

2015-02-04 Thread Lev Serebryakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05.02.2015 01:16, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > I have such rules in my firewall: > > nat 9 config redirect_port tcp 192.168.134.2:16881 16881 > redirect_port udp 192.158.134.2:16881 16881 redirect_port tcp > 192.168.134.2:22 2 > > nat 1 config

Re: does "nat redirect_port tcp" works for you on -CURRENT?

2015-02-04 Thread Lev Serebryakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05.02.2015 01:16, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > nat 9 config redirect_port tcp 192.168.134.2:16881 16881 > redirect_port udp 192.158.134.2:16881 16881 redirect_port tcp > 192.168.134.2:22 2 Also, if I add "log" to this config: nat 9 config log r

does "nat redirect_port tcp" works for you on -CURRENT?

2015-02-04 Thread Lev Serebryakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I have such rules in my firewall: nat 9 config redirect_port tcp 192.168.134.2:16881 16881 redirect_port udp 192.158.134.2:16881 16881 redirect_port tcp 192.168.134.2:22 2 nat 1 config ip $EXT_IP same_ports ... // Packets from outer world 110