* VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But if it is quite simple to fix for -HEAD, which now only have
> netipsec/ipsec.h, it is harder to solve cleanly for older versions,
> which have both netinet6/ipsec.h and netipsec/ipsec.h, and on which I
> just don't know how to guess which one we s
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
(taking the thread to net@ only as it does not affect current@ but is
more a port@ thing)
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 05:41:04AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:49:37 +0200,
Peter Blok w
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 05:41:04AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >At Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:49:37 +0200,
> >Peter Blok wrote:
Hi all.
[KAME's IPSec removal and ipsec-tools]
> I have a preliminary hackish patch. The problem is that I have other
> patch
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Morning,
At Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:49:37 +0200,
Peter Blok wrote:
Hi George,
Is somebody looking at ipsec-tools? As far as I can see it requires a
lot of kame definitions, although not used most of the times. I have
tried to make sense of this, but
At Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:49:37 +0200,
Peter Blok wrote:
>
> Hi George,
>
> Is somebody looking at ipsec-tools? As far as I can see it requires a
> lot of kame definitions, although not used most of the times. I have
> tried to make sense of this, but it wasn't easy.
I am not right now, if you have
Hi George,
Is somebody looking at ipsec-tools? As far as I can see it requires a
lot of kame definitions, although not used most of the times. I have
tried to make sense of this, but it wasn't easy.
Peter
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Please forward problems, and patches to me, or this list.
I think it has to do with this:
Because of the recent deletion of serval netinet6 includefiles in
current the net/p5-Socket6 port didnt compile anymore.
===> Building for p5-Socket6-0.19
cp Socket6.pm blib
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, John E Hein wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 21:21 +0900 on Jul 3, 2007:
> Please forward problems, and patches to me, or this list.
How about the NAT-T patches (see ports/ipsec-tools/Makefile)?
Any plans to integrate those?
see
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 21:21 +0900 on Jul 3, 2007:
> Please forward problems, and patches to me, or this list.
How about the NAT-T patches (see ports/ipsec-tools/Makefile)?
Any plans to integrate those?
This was just recently discussed on freebsd-net in May and updated for
-current at that
Great work George.. :-D
R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My most recent check-in moves FreeBSD HEAD, soon to be 7.0 into the
post Kame era. What was once FAST_IPSEC has been made into IPSEC and
the Kame IPsec code has been removed from the tree. We will continue
to use and update the Kame IPv6
Hi,
My most recent check-in moves FreeBSD HEAD, soon to be 7.0 into the
post Kame era. What was once FAST_IPSEC has been made into IPSEC and
the Kame IPsec code has been removed from the tree. We will continue
to use and update the Kame IPv6 code but of course there will be no
more drops of code
11 matches
Mail list logo
