On Wednesday 12 December 2001 23:35, Sam Tannous wrote:
> I've download the ethfw patches (v1.2) and they work fine
> on my 4.4 system. One other good reason to add ethfw
> to the existing ipfw code (and this is purely subjective)
> is that it would look more like ipfw:
>
> 00100 27 1144 allow
On Monday 03 December 2001 21:28, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Sebastien,
> this is a personal point of view, and I know that people think
> differently, but I believe it would be a lot more interesting if
> you would design ethfw as an add-on for ipfw as opposed to a separate
> thing. Not only it would r
Sebastien,
this is a personal point of view, and I know that people think
differently, but I believe it would be a lot more interesting if
you would design ethfw as an add-on for ipfw as opposed to a separate
thing. Not only it would remove some replication from the code (all
[sg]etsockopt, basica
Hi,
I just release a new patch file for implementing an Ethernet Firewall under
FreeBSD. the tar.gz distro come with a patch for 4.4 kernels, an utility
ethfw to control rules and a man page. Is there a possibility to implement
this patch (based on Luigi Rizzo ipfw code) on the FreeBSD /usr/sr
