Yes it was a typo I meant -w -I
It just doesn't add up to what the switch is seeing, and it's directly
connected and the traffic can't be going anywhere else.
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greetings,
I just have a question:
is "netstat -w 100 lagg0" a typo ?
If you want to see the traffic only on
Greetings,
I just have a question:
is "netstat -w 100 lagg0" a typo ?
If you want to see the traffic only on single interface you should use -I
I do not know if this is bug, but netstat -w 100 something_non_existing
works on my bsd and just shows "Total"
So may be from here comes the confu
This is very strange.. I can do:
netstat -w 10 -I lagg0
input(lagg0) output
packets errs bytespackets errs bytes colls
57806 0 41751685 232442 0 51062425 0
56459 0 38341591 225146 0 48865209 0
60687
