On 8/13/13 8:34 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Artem,
Um.. i was planning to use the included natd
But i think it has only one external address to use
I think there is a couple of rules to add to ipfw to enable NAT, that
maybe where you divert to here or there:
ipfw add divert natd all from 192.16
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:11:37PM +0400, ar...@artem.ru wrote:
> There is a router with 3 interfaces:
>
> IF1: PROVIDER A
> IF2: PROVIDER B
> IF3: LAN
>
> Clients served via NAT. There are about 15 clients.
>
> Now, what i need to do:
>
> By default all traffic from all clients goes to PROVID
Artem,
> Um.. i was planning to use the included natd
> But i think it has only one external address to use
I think there is a couple of rules to add to ipfw to enable NAT, that
maybe where you divert to here or there:
ipfw add divert natd all from 192.169.x.y to any via ISPB
ipfw add divert nat
13.08.2013 16:19, Olivier Nicole пишет:
Artem,
I have a strange task and don't understand how to implement such scheme.
There is a router with 3 interfaces:
IF1: PROVIDER A
IF2: PROVIDER B
IF3: LAN
Clients served via NAT. There are about 15 clients.
Now, what i need to do:
By default all t
Artem,
> I have a strange task and don't understand how to implement such scheme.
>
> There is a router with 3 interfaces:
>
> IF1: PROVIDER A
> IF2: PROVIDER B
> IF3: LAN
>
> Clients served via NAT. There are about 15 clients.
>
> Now, what i need to do:
>
> By default all traffic from all client
Hello!
I have a strange task and don't understand how to implement such scheme.
There is a router with 3 interfaces:
IF1: PROVIDER A
IF2: PROVIDER B
IF3: LAN
Clients served via NAT. There are about 15 clients.
Now, what i need to do:
By default all traffic from all clients goes to PROVIDER A
