James Healy wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andre Oppermann wrote:
The first cut is now at //depot/projects/tcp_reass/ however I made
a mistake when creating the branch and now the code is in the same
changeset as the branching itself. Doesn't make it easy to do a
diff. H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> The first cut is now at //depot/projects/tcp_reass/ however I made
> a mistake when creating the branch and now the code is in the same
> changeset as the branching itself. Doesn't make it easy to do a
> diff. Have to see how
On 2008-01-11 03:19, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>>> I've got a rewritten and much more efficient tcp_reass() function in
>>> my local tree. I'll import it into Perforce next week with all the
>>> other stuff. You may want to base your auto-sizing work on i
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
I've got a rewritten and much more efficient tcp_reass() function
in my local tree. I'll import it into Perforce next week with all
the other stuff. You may want to base your auto-sizing work on it.
The only missing parts are some statistics gathering.
Where abouts is
Hi Randall,
Comments inline...
Randall Stewart wrote:
Robert:
One thing I would like to point out for one of Lawrence's project
is that SCTP is also hanging around in the kernel and as
part of one of our URP's (which is also where Lawrence's project
came from.. if I remember right)... we added
Robert:
One thing I would like to point out for one of Lawrence's project
is that SCTP is also hanging around in the kernel and as
part of one of our URP's (which is also where Lawrence's project
came from.. if I remember right)... we added "selectable"
congestion control to SCTP.. well it was no
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi Andre,
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
[snip]
Jim and I recently discussed the idea of implementing autotuning of
the TCP reassembly queue size based on analysis of some experimental
work we've been doing. It's a small project, but we feel it would
Hi Andre,
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
[snip]
Jim and I recently discussed the idea of implementing autotuning of
the TCP reassembly queue size based on analysis of some experimental
work we've been doing. It's a small project, but we feel it would be
worth implementing.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:09:13PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> I'd like for us to create a wiki page tracking these various projects, and
> pointing at per-project resources. Once the discussion has settled a bit,
> I can take responsibility for creating such a page, but will need everyone
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi Robert,
Comments inline.
Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all,
It is rapidly becoming clear that quite a few of us have Big Plans for
the TCP implementation over the next 12-18 months. It's important
that we get the plans out on the table now so that everyone working o
Hi Robert,
Comments inline.
Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all,
It is rapidly becoming clear that quite a few of us have Big Plans for
the TCP implementation over the next 12-18 months. It's important
that we get the plans out on the table now so that everyone working on
these projects is awar
Dear all,
It is rapidly becoming clear that quite a few of us have Big Plans for the TCP
implementation over the next 12-18 months. It's important that we get the
plans out on the table now so that everyone working on these projects is aware
of the larger context. This will encourage collab
12 matches
Mail list logo
