On 2014-12-18 11:29:01 (+0100), Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> On 2014-11-09 21:15, Kristof Provost wrote:
> > On 2014-11-09 14:30:55 (+0100), Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> >> On 07.11.14, 14:31, Kristof Provost wrote:
> > You can find the patch series here:
> > http://www.sigsegv.be/files/pf_inet6_frag.tar
> > a
On 2014-11-09 21:15, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 2014-11-09 14:30:55 (+0100), Ilya Bakulin wrote:
On 07.11.14, 14:31, Kristof Provost wrote:
You can find the patch series here:
http://www.sigsegv.be/files/pf_inet6_frag.tar
and everything in one big patch here:
http://www.sigsegv.be/files/pf_inet
Hello Ilya,
just approval from some people.
I will follow-up.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> Hi Ermal,
> yes, this patch works for both #179392 and #172648.
>
> What do you need to merge this into -CURRENT and MFC to stable/9?
>
>
> On 2014-11-14 12:57, Ermal Luçi wrote:
Hi Ermal,
yes, this patch works for both #179392 and #172648.
What do you need to merge this into -CURRENT and MFC to stable/9?
On 2014-11-14 12:57, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> Here is a direct patch.
> Give it a try.
>
> For the reply-to issues there is another patch complementary to this i
> will send
Here is a direct patch.
Give it a try.
For the reply-to issues there is another patch complementary to this i will
send.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> actually with _my_ checksumming patch the rdr-to is broken completely :-(
> So I'm waiting for Ermal to se
Hi all,
actually with _my_ checksumming patch the rdr-to is broken completely
:-(
So I'm waiting for Ermal to send an updated version of his patch that
may really solve the problem!
On 2014-11-14 09:17, Ermal Luçi wrote:
Yes confirmed it will solve that issue as well.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 a
Yes confirmed it will solve that issue as well.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:30 PM, J David wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> > Of course it was interesting what does the upstream PF do (@ OpenBSD).
> Seems
> > they have made the decision to
> > leave the task of recal
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> Of course it was interesting what does the upstream PF do (@ OpenBSD). Seems
> they have made the decision to
> leave the task of recalculating the checksums for outgoing packets to
> ip[6]_output, because currently
> the code there overwrites
On 2014-11-09 14:30:55 (+0100), Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> On 07.11.14, 14:31, Kristof Provost wrote:
> > I've been playing with it too. I have a patch which seems to be working,
> > but it currently drops the distinction between PFRULE_FRAGCROP and
> > PFRULE_FRAGDROP. OpenBSD dropped that a while ago
On 07.11.14, 14:31, Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 2014-11-05 19:11:55 (+0100), Ilya Bakulin wrote:
>> On 2014-11-05 19:00, Mark Felder wrote:
>>> Now if we could only stamp out the bug with ipv6 fragment and pf I'd be
>>> a happy, happy daemon. :-)
>> This is somewhat more complex problem, I'll take
On 2014-11-05 19:11:55 (+0100), Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> On 2014-11-05 19:00, Mark Felder wrote:
> > Now if we could only stamp out the bug with ipv6 fragment and pf I'd be
> > a happy, happy daemon. :-)
>
> This is somewhat more complex problem, I'll take a look as the time
> allows.
>
I've been
On 2014-11-05 19:00, Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014, at 08:28, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
Hi all,
I have been hit by this 2-year-old bug with PF and 'scrub reassemble
tcp' on IPv6 connections:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172648
Wow, this is great. I've known about this
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014, at 08:28, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been hit by this 2-year-old bug with PF and 'scrub reassemble
> tcp' on IPv6 connections:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172648
>
Wow, this is great. I've known about this problem since I discovered i
Hi all,
I have been hit by this 2-year-old bug with PF and 'scrub reassemble
tcp' on IPv6 connections:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172648
I have been able to trace it down to the modifications of timestamp
values by timestamp modulation code [1].
If I remove those two pf
14 matches
Mail list logo
