Re: Changing TOS value

2004-08-16 Thread Andrew Degtiariov
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 09:42:43PM +, Thiago Pinto Damas wrote: > > But there is an ALTQ package for FreeBSD 4.10? http://www.kame.net/ (Kame contains ALTQ in itself) > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:09:52AM +0545, Bikrant Neupane wrote: > >> Hi, > >> Thanks for the reply. But my problem is s

Re: Changing TOS value

2004-08-15 Thread Thiago Pinto Damas
But there is an ALTQ package for FreeBSD 4.10? Andrew Degtiariov writes: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:09:52AM +0545, Bikrant Neupane wrote: >> Hi, >> Thanks for the reply. But my problem is something else. I want to change the >> TOS value. In Linux we can change the TOS value in the mangle t

Re: Changing TOS value

2004-08-15 Thread Andrew Degtiariov
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:09:52AM +0545, Bikrant Neupane wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for the reply. But my problem is something else. I want to change the > TOS value. In Linux we can change the TOS value in the mangle table. Is that > possible in FreeBSD? Yes, ALTQ its can (ALTQ come with KAME). --

Re: Changing TOS value

2004-08-14 Thread Bikrant Neupane
Hi, Thanks for the reply. But my problem is something else. I want to change the TOS value. In Linux we can change the TOS value in the mangle table. Is that possible in FreeBSD? regards, Bikrant On Sunday 15 August 2004 07:47, Thiago Pinto Damas wrote: > Try to limit the bandwidth for each i

Re: Changing TOS value

2004-08-14 Thread Thiago Pinto Damas
Try to limit the bandwidth for each interface, like: ipfw pipe 1 config bw 512Kbits/s ipfw pipe 2 config bw 512Kbits/s ipfw add pipe 1 ip from 10.0.0.8 to any via wi0 in ipfw add pipe 2 ip from any to 10.0.0.8 via wi0 out This might work! Bikrant Neupane writes: > Hi, > I am using fre

Changing TOS value

2004-08-10 Thread Bikrant Neupane
Hi, I am using freebsd 4.9 as a bandwidth manager. I would like to set IP TOS field to some desired value or is it possible to completely ignore the TOS value? I have observed that using different value of TOS affects fairness in b/w allocation in a pipe. So for that specific reason I