Re: BIND: Lookup of CNAME records

2004-04-02 Thread Lutz Petersen
I have installed BIND 9 now, and everything works like a charm. Presumably BIND 8 simply doesn't handle lookups correctly. Crist J. Clark wrote: It looks like "fw" is messed up. Those responses don't carry any authority records. The queries for the root servers are returning "no error" with

Re: BIND: Lookup of CNAME records

2004-03-28 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:59:11PM +0100, Lutz Petersen wrote: > Crist J. Clark wrote: > >How long does it take to do a reverse-lookup on the result of the > >previous lookups? The applications may be trying to resolve a PTR > >record for the final IP address they end up with. > > Reverse lookups

Re: BIND: Lookup of CNAME records

2004-03-24 Thread Lutz Petersen
Crist J. Clark wrote: How long does it take to do a reverse-lookup on the result of the previous lookups? The applications may be trying to resolve a PTR record for the final IP address they end up with. Reverse lookups work fine. But I do not think PTR lookups are an issue in this case (see below)

Re: BIND: Lookup of CNAME records

2004-03-19 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:54:37AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have set up a FreeBSD (5.2.1-RELEASE) box acting as a gateway and > running version 8.3.7-REL of BIND. For testing purposes my > configuration file looks as follows: > > options { > directory "/etc/namedb"; > pid-file "/var

BIND: Lookup of CNAME records

2004-03-18 Thread 789456123
I have set up a FreeBSD (5.2.1-RELEASE) box acting as a gateway and running version 8.3.7-REL of BIND. For testing purposes my configuration file looks as follows: options { directory "/etc/namedb"; pid-file "/var/run/named/pid"; forward only; forwarders { 195.62.99.42; 195.62.97