On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 16:57 -07:00, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Konstantin Kuzvesov < kuzve...@list.ru >
>wrote:
>>
>>I've got a FreeBSD file server running Samba, file upload speeds are okay,
>>but downloads are too slow.
>>First, I decided it is Samba's fault, but
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 16:57 -07:00, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Konstantin Kuzvesov < kuzve...@list.ru >
>wrote:
>>
>>I've got a FreeBSD file server running Samba, file upload speeds are okay,
>>but downloads are too slow.
>>First, I decided it is Samba's fault, but
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Konstantin Kuzvesov wrote:
>
> I've got a FreeBSD file server running Samba, file upload speeds are okay,
> but downloads are too slow.
> First, I decided it is Samba's fault, but then I ran iperf tests...
>
> On a windows machine with gigabit NIC:
> Z:\iperf>iperf
I've got a FreeBSD file server running Samba, file upload speeds are okay, but
downloads are too slow.
First, I decided it is Samba's fault, but then I ran iperf tests...
On a windows machine with gigabit NIC:
Z:\iperf>iperf -c 192.168.0.1
On 07.10.2013 18:59, Konstantin Kuzvesov wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with NIC performance. Is this the right place to ask for
help?
Probably, if you are able to provide some more detailed information :)
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello,
I have a problem with NIC performance. Is this the right place to ask for
help?
--
Best regards,
Konstantin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free
