Ermal Luçi escreveu:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Makonnen wrote:
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
To let you know of my current (real world) tests:
- Wireless Internet Provider 1:
- 4Mbit/s of Internet Traffic
- Classifying defau
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Makonnen wrote:
>>
>> Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
>>>
>>> To let you know of my current (real world) tests:
>>>
>>> - Wireless Internet Provider 1:
>>>- 4Mbit/s of Internet Traffic
>>>- Classifying default protoco
Patrick Tracanelli escreveu:
Mike Makonnen escreveu:
Mike Makonnen wrote:
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
To let you know of my current (real world) tests:
- Wireless Internet Provider 1:
- 4Mbit/s of Internet Traffic
- Classifying default protocols + soulseek + ssh
- Classifying 100Mb
Mike Makonnen escreveu:
Mike Makonnen wrote:
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
To let you know of my current (real world) tests:
- Wireless Internet Provider 1:
- 4Mbit/s of Internet Traffic
- Classifying default protocols + soulseek + ssh
- Classifying 100Mbit/s of dump over ssh
Results
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> > > Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
> > > > Mike Makonnen escreveu:
[..]
> > /*
> > * Inform divert(4) what rule to send it to by
> > * mod
Ian Smith wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
> > Mike Makonnen escreveu:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
> >> very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P
> >> file sha
Mike Makonnen wrote:
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
To let you know of my current (real world) tests:
- Wireless Internet Provider 1:
- 4Mbit/s of Internet Traffic
- Classifying default protocols + soulseek + ssh
- Classifying 100Mbit/s of dump over ssh
Results in:
No latency added
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
> > Mike Makonnen escreveu:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
> >> very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P
> >> file sharing applications w
One thing, can you please make the SYN/ACK table optional since on
pf(4) you have the info from the state table when a tcp connection is
established.
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Ermal Luçi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
>>
>> eculp escreveu:
>>>
>>> Quoting Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
>
> You will go to develop a version to work with PF ?
>
I don't know
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
eculp escreveu:
Quoting Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
You will go to develop a version to work with PF ?
I don't know what's needed to get it to work with pf, but if it's
not too
much work, sure.
That would be great, Mike. I'm
Ermal Luçi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ermal Luçi wrote:
Thanks for this.
I have a question, you remove a flow from if you see a FIN for the TCP
case and only on overlapping flow for either TCP/UDP how do the other
flows expire i am m
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
To let you know of my current (real world) tests:
- Wireless Internet Provider 1:
- 4Mbit/s of Internet Traffic
- Classifying default protocols + soulseek + ssh
- Classifying 100Mbit/s of dump over ssh
Results in:
No latency added, very low CPU usage,
Julian Elischer escreveu:
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Mike Makonnen escreveu:
Hi,
An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P
file sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I
looked f
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ermal Luçi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
>>> very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P file
>>> sharing applications which were hog
eculp escreveu:
Quoting Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
You will go to develop a version to work with PF ?
I don't know what's needed to get it to work with pf, but if it's not too
much work, sure.
That would be great, Mike. I'm seeing more and more bandwid
Quoting Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
You will go to develop a version to work with PF ?
I don't know what's needed to get it to work with pf, but if it's not too
much work, sure.
That would be great, Mike. I'm seeing more and more bandwidth being
used w
Petri Helenius escreveu:
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
I have raised the queue lenght a lot, up to 40960, and the behavior
was the same. Ill keep trying and let you know if any success.
No queue depth is going to help you if you receive more data than you
can process.
Pete
From here, where
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
I have raised the queue lenght a lot, up to 40960, and the behavior
was the same. Ill keep trying and let you know if any success.
No queue depth is going to help you if you receive more data than you
can process.
Pete
Patrick Tracanelli escreveu:
I guess I need some help here. How can I increase (and what should I be
aware) the input queue?
Under 20Mbit/s of load, I have the following problem:
Aug 1 11:14:45 ourofino last message repeated 5828 times
Aug 1 11:14:45 ourofino ipfw-classifyd: MATCH edonkey(50
I guess I need some help here. How can I increase (and what should I be
aware) the input queue?
Under 20Mbit/s of load, I have the following problem:
Aug 1 11:14:45 ourofino last message repeated 5828 times
Aug 1 11:14:45 ourofino ipfw-classifyd: MATCH edonkey(5):
88.165.54.165:50286 ->
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Mike Makonnen escreveu:
Hi,
An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P
file sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I
looked for programs that would all
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
You will go to develop a version to work with PF ?
I don't know what's needed to get it to work with pf, but if it's not too
much work, sure.
Cheers.
--
Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://people.freebsd.org/~mtm/mtm.asc
mtm @ FreeBSD.Org | AC7B 5672 2D11 F4D0
Ermal Luçi wrote:
Hi,
An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P file
sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I looked for
programs that would allow me to shape traffic according to
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:18:31 -0700
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paolo Pisati wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:02:29PM +0300, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> >> While I have not done extensive testing, preliminary tests are encouraging
> >> and it seems to work, so I thought I'd anno
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Mike Makonnen escreveu:
Hi,
An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P
file sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I
looked for programs that would all
Paolo Pisati wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:02:29PM +0300, Mike Makonnen wrote:
While I have not done extensive testing, preliminary tests are encouraging
and it seems to work, so I thought I'd announce it to the rest of the world
in case anyone else is interested in this kind of application
You will go to develop a version to work with PF ?
Mike Makonnen escreveu:
Hi,
An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P
file sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I
looked for
> Hi,
>
> An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
> very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P file
> sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I looked for
> programs that would allow me to shape traffic according to the
> app
Mike Makonnen escreveu:
Hi,
An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P file
sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I looked for
programs that would allow me to shape traffic acco
Mike Makonnen wrote:
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi Mike,
Mike Makonnen wrote:
[snip]
sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I looked
for programs that would allow me to shape traffic according to the
application layer protocol, but couldn't find any for FreeBSD. I
found a
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi Mike,
Mike Makonnen wrote:
[snip]
sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I looked
for programs that would allow me to shape traffic according to the
application layer protocol, but couldn't find any for FreeBSD. I
found a couple: l7-filter and
Hi Mike,
Mike Makonnen wrote:
[snip]
sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I looked for
programs that would allow me to shape traffic according to the
application layer protocol, but couldn't find any for FreeBSD. I found a
couple: l7-filter and ipp2p, but these are Lin
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:02:29PM +0300, Mike Makonnen wrote:
>
> While I have not done extensive testing, preliminary tests are encouraging
> and it seems to work, so I thought I'd announce it to the rest of the world
> in case anyone else is interested in this kind of application.
That's a m
Hi,
An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with
very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P file
sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I looked for
programs that would allow me to shape traffic according to the
application
35 matches
Mail list logo
