On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, 03:02-0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
This appears to work for Igor, and it seems safe enough to commit before
4.11-RC2. But, if possible, I'd like a few more sets of eyes to doublecheck
the concept and code; please take a look at it if
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, 03:02-0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> > There have been a few reports by users of front end web proxies and other
> > systems under FreeBSD that port randomization causes them problems under
> > load. This seems to be due to a co
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote:
There have been a few reports by users of front end web proxies and other
systems under FreeBSD that port randomization causes them problems under
load. This seems to be due to a combination of port randomization and rapid
connections to the same hos
Hi Mike,
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, 04:03-0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
[...]
> Although this isn't a perfect fix, I think that it should be
> acceptable for the vast majority of systems, and I'd like to get it
> in before 4.11-release ships. To be conservative, I'll probably
> choose a value like 5, w
There have been a few reports by users of front end web proxies and other
systems under FreeBSD that port randomization causes them problems under
load. This seems to be due to a combination of port randomization and
rapid connections to the same host causing ports to be recycled before the
IS
