On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 11:48:56 -0500, Matthew Rezny wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, it set me in the right direction. I checked
> my fibre before but went ahead and checked it again. In doing so, I
> rearranged the cables at the switch to check if that made a difference.
> Sure enough, one p
Thanks for the suggestion, it set me in the right direction. I checked
my fibre before but went ahead and checked it again. In doing so, I
rearranged the cables at the switch to check if that made a difference.
Sure enough, one port on the switch makes the connection drop often. I
hope its just du
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 15:55:30 -0500, Matthew Rezny wrote:
> I have some more information since my initial posting yesterday. I set
> the NMBCLUSTERS back to default, which made no difference. Therefore,
> moving from 4.3 to 4.4 is what drastically increased the frequency at
> which the link goe
I have some more information since my initial posting yesterday. I set
the NMBCLUSTERS back to default, which made no difference. Therefore,
moving from 4.3 to 4.4 is what drastically increased the frequency at
which the link goes down and back up. I also captured dmesg now I case
there is any use