On Monday 29 August 2005 16:10, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> D> (I'll try it later but a definitive answer would be nice :)
>
> If you have put smth into ng_iface_start(), then you should do this
> stuff via ng_send_fn().
OK.
> Sorry, that I haven't yet feedbacked on your patches. I'll probably look
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 02:49:14PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
D> On Sunday 31 July 2005 22:53, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
D> > > The calling code must always have a reference on the node to ensure that
D> > > it is not removed while it is running in it. This is sometimes
D> > > done automatically. T
On Sunday 31 July 2005 22:53, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > The calling code must always have a reference on the node to ensure that
> > it is not removed while it is running in it. This is sometimes
> > done automatically. This is why there is an ng_callout facility to ensure
> > that the locking and
On Sunday 31 July 2005 05:08, Julian Elischer wrote:
> mbuf tags have "families" so that differetn modules can use
> the same ID numbers and not clash.
> here is a netgraph family for tags, using the netgraph cookies.
> It's been a while since I looked at it but if you are using mbuf
> tags in net
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2005 19:00, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I'll try my hand at the ng_iface ALTQ patch.
Here's what I have so far..
http://www.dons.net.au/~darius/ng_iface-altq.diff
Haven't done much testing yet though.
small comments so far..
mbuf tags have "families
On Saturday 30 July 2005 19:00, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> I'll try my hand at the ng_iface ALTQ patch.
Here's what I have so far..
http://www.dons.net.au/~darius/ng_iface-altq.diff
Haven't done much testing yet though.
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http
On Friday 29 July 2005 12:35, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I do this to great effect..
> consider:
> two sites connected by links in which teh bottleneck is 200KB/sec (1 E1?)
> when a lot of data is flowing from 1 to 2 then data from 2 to 1 is also
> slowed
> down because the acks have to go through t
On Friday 29 July 2005 12:35, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I do this to great effect..
> consider:
> two sites connected by links in which teh bottleneck is 200KB/sec (1 E1?)
> when a lot of data is flowing from 1 to 2 then data from 2 to 1 is also
> slowed
> down because the acks have to go through t
Hi Daniel, Chunk, Julian and all,
> >slow things down. So you want to send dataless ACKs at a higher
> >priority than generic big packets full of data, maybe via the "iplen"
> >keyword with "established", look for packets smaller than ~100 bytes?
>
> [...]
>
> I sometimes actually prioitise AL
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Friday 29 July 2005 11:02, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Either the "established" or the "tcpflags !syn,ack" keywords in a rule
adding matching packets to a high-priority queue ought to do it...? Or
perhaps you meant something more specific than just "T
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Friday 29 July 2005 11:02, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Either the "established" or the "tcpflags !syn,ack" keywords in a rule
adding matching packets to a high-priority queue ought to do it...? Or
perhaps you meant something more specific than just "TCP packets with
TH_ACK" se
On Friday 29 July 2005 11:02, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Either the "established" or the "tcpflags !syn,ack" keywords in a rule
> adding matching packets to a high-priority queue ought to do it...? Or
> perhaps you meant something more specific than just "TCP packets with
> TH_ACK" set? :-)
Hmm, I gu
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Friday 29 July 2005 10:10, Julian Elischer wrote:
[ ... ]
ipfw and dummynet work on ng_iface I believe.
Well yeah, but dummynet is a little inflexible and can't prioritise ACKs (for
example)
Either the "established" or the "tcpflags !syn,ack" keywords in a rule ad
On Friday 29 July 2005 10:10, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >Does anyone have any patches
>
> ipfw and dummynet work on ng_iface I believe.
Well yeah, but dummynet is a little inflexible and can't prioritise ACKs (for
example)
> is there altq for tun or gif?
Yes for tun, rev 1.143 of if_tun.c.
No f
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at using pf + AltQ + mpd instead of my original ipfw + dummynet +
ppp setup but it seems that ng_iface doesn't have any AltQ hooks :(
I had a look at it to see if they could be retrofitted but alas it appears the
ng_iface driver is not very much like
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at using pf + AltQ + mpd instead of my original ipfw + dummynet +
ppp setup but it seems that ng_iface doesn't have any AltQ hooks :(
I had a look at it to see if they could be retrofitted but alas it appears the
ng_iface driver is not very much like
Hi,
I am looking at using pf + AltQ + mpd instead of my original ipfw + dummynet +
ppp setup but it seems that ng_iface doesn't have any AltQ hooks :(
I had a look at it to see if they could be retrofitted but alas it appears the
ng_iface driver is not very much like others (ie no queueing of pa
17 matches
Mail list logo
