Re: About IFNET_PCP_NONE

2023-08-29 Thread Zhenlei Huang
> On Aug 29, 2023, at 9:23 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:25:01PM +0800, Zhenlei Huang wrote: >> >> >>> On Aug 28, 2023, at 3:54 PM, Konstantin Belousov >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:51:38AM +0800, Zhenlei Huang wrote: Hi Konstantin,

Re: About IFNET_PCP_NONE

2023-08-28 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:25:01PM +0800, Zhenlei Huang wrote: > > > > On Aug 28, 2023, at 3:54 PM, Konstantin Belousov > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:51:38AM +0800, Zhenlei Huang wrote: > >> Hi Konstantin, > >> > >> > >> I was just about going to open a PR for https://reviews

Re: About IFNET_PCP_NONE

2023-08-28 Thread Zhenlei Huang
> On Aug 28, 2023, at 3:54 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:51:38AM +0800, Zhenlei Huang wrote: >> Hi Konstantin, >> >> >> I was just about going to open a PR for https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39536 >> and >> realized I might made wrong assumption. >> >> I though

Re: About IFNET_PCP_NONE

2023-08-28 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:51:38AM +0800, Zhenlei Huang wrote: > Hi Konstantin, > > > I was just about going to open a PR for https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39536 and > realized I might made wrong assumption. > > I thought IFNET_PCP_NONE is something like IEEE8021Q_PCP_BE but I second why > not >

About IFNET_PCP_NONE

2023-08-27 Thread Zhenlei Huang
Hi Konstantin, I was just about going to open a PR for https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39536 and realized I might made wrong assumption. I thought IFNET_PCP_NONE is something like IEEE8021Q_PCP_BE but I second why not use IEEE8021Q_PCP_BE but a new const IFNET_PCP_NONE. So despite its naming IFNET