On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
However, the "request/respones" tests are awfull for my notebook (test
repeated on the notebook for the sake of conviction) :
Is it possible to rerun these tests with a 7.0 kernel of the same general
configuration? That would help us determine if
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
>
> > However, the "request/respones" tests are awfull for my notebook
> > (test repeated on the notebook for the sake of conviction) :
>
> Is it possible to rerun these tests with a 7.0 kernel of the same
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:12:56PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
[...]
> >
> > AFAIK it seems that you're the first one that reports poor
> > performance issue of MCP65.
>
>
> someone must be ;) no kiddin, I am not convinced this is (only)
> a driver issue (cf. "bad NFS/UDP performance
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Holger Kipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Noyou misunderstood. The 7.1 box was connected to a 5.4 box doing a 50GB
>> data transfer over rsync. Both nics were 1000 full duplex with a crossove
> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:03:10 +0200
> From: Holger Kipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Noyou misunderstood. The 7.1 box was connected to a 5.4 box
> doing a 50GB > data transfer over rsync. Both
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:10:29PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
>
> >However, the "request/respones" tests are awfull for my notebook (test
> >repeated on the notebook for the sake of conviction) :
>
> Is it possible to rerun these tests with a 7.
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
However, the "request/respones" tests are awfull for my notebook (test
repeated on the notebook for the sake of conviction) :
Is it possible to rerun these tests with a 7.0 kernel of the same general
configuration? That would help us determine if
Dear Pyun,
thanx for your prompt answer (as usual).
Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:21:00PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've serious network performance problems on a HP Turion X2
> > based brand new notebook; I onl
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Noyou misunderstood. The 7.1 box was connected to a 5.4 box doing a 50GB
> data transfer over rsync. Both nics were 1000 full duplex with a crossover
> cable.
> The speed performance was terrible and I could only get up to
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:21:00PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I've serious network performance problems on a HP Turion X2
> based brand new notebook; I only used a 7-1Beta CD and
> 7-STABLE on this thing.
>
> Scp-ing ports.tgz from a rock-stable 7-STABLE server to
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:15:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:15:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over
> >
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:15:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gary Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over
> > 50GB
> > from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossov
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over
> 50GB
> from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossover cable
> and
> the link was 1000 full duplex, but could only get about 10M/s.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over
> 50GB
> from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossover cable
> and
> the link was 1000 full duplex, but could only get about 10M/s.
I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over
50GB
from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossover cable
and
the link was 1000 full duplex, but could only get about 10M/s. Very odd.
Did a
tcpdump and saw lots of bad checksum errors.
What other trou
Hello,
I've serious network performance problems on a HP Turion X2
based brand new notebook; I only used a 7-1Beta CD and
7-STABLE on this thing.
Scp-ing ports.tgz from a rock-stable 7-STABLE server to it gives :
# scp -p ports.tgz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/
ports.tgz
18 matches
Mail list logo
