Hello,
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:54:09 -0600
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Craig Boston) said:
> > Could you please try the following patch?
> > http://www.kame.net/~suz/in6.c.diff.releng60
>
> Been running with your patch all day and so far no problems whatsoever.
> I can run ifconfig over
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:59:39PM +0900, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote:
> Hello Craig,
> I think I've done with it.
>
> Could you please try the following patch?
> http://www.kame.net/~suz/in6.c.diff.releng60
Been running with your patch all day and so far no problems whatsoever.
I can run ifconfi
Hello Craig,
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 21:22:08 +0900
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](SUZUKI Shinsuke) said:
> Here's the list of possible solutions. I'm now working on the
> second one. But if you need an immediately solution for
> 6.0-RELEASE, please consider the first one.
I think I've done with i
Hello all,
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:14:16 -0500
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Craig Boston) said:
> Knowing that, I can cause it to happen on command by manually
> re-configuring an interface with an address it already has:
> # ifconfig em1 inet6 2002:abcd:ef01:::20
> (routes are all normal)
>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 12:04:53AM +0900, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote:
> I tried the same test using my PC with fxp drivers, but your phenomena
> did not happen in my environment (at least for five hours).
>
> Maybe the configured prefix was regarded as off-link by some reason.
> (it is theoretically po
Hello Craig,
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:18:33 +0900
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](SUZUKI Shinsuke) said:
> > Yes, but em0 and em1 are on different computers attached to the same
> > network (em0 on the second computer isn't connected to anything right
> > now). I think they have to have the same pr
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:09:01 -0500
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Craig Boston) said:
> > In your configuration, em0 and em1 have the same prefix.
> > Is it intentionally configured?
> > #normally, IPv6 operator does not assign prefix in such manner...
>
> Yes, but em0 and em1 are on different co
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:55:49PM +0900, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote:
> Let me confirm.
>
> In your configuration, em0 and em1 have the same prefix.
> Is it intentionally configured?
> #normally, IPv6 operator does not assign prefix in such manner...
Yes, but em0 and em1 are on different computers att
Hello Craig,
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:29:57 -0500
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Craig Boston) said:
> [ I'm not subscribed to net@ so please copy me! ]
> It's been a while since I've used IPv6 (was on 4.x), so it's possible
> I'm doing something wrong, but it seems like this should work.
(snip)
>
[ I'm not subscribed to net@ so please copy me! ]
It's been a while since I've used IPv6 (was on 4.x), so it's possible
I'm doing something wrong, but it seems like this should work.
Setup: A simple network with 3 or 4 FreeBSD boxes running 6.0-RC1. No
contact with the outside world, no routers,
10 matches
Mail list logo
