08.08.2016 8:57, Sepherosa Ziehau пишет:
We have an optimized wrk here:
https://github.com/sepherosa/wrk
I've glanced over your changes to wrk.
(Btw, you have minor bug there: missed 'N' short flag in getopt_long()
invocation
for new --delay option, so "wrk --delay" works but "wrk -N" fails to
On 08.08.2016 08:57, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> We have an optimized wrk here:
> https://github.com/sepherosa/wrk
>
> It greatly reduces the # of kqueue syscalls and avoids unnecessary
> setsockopt etc.
What branch should I fetch?
___
freebsd-net@freeb
On 08.08.2016 08:57, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> We have an optimized wrk here:
> https://github.com/sepherosa/wrk
Thank you, I'll try it.
> It greatly reduces the # of kqueue syscalls and avoids unnecessary
> setsockopt etc. BTW, how many concurrent connections and threads are
> you testing w/?
We have an optimized wrk here:
https://github.com/sepherosa/wrk
It greatly reduces the # of kqueue syscalls and avoids unnecessary
setsockopt etc. BTW, how many concurrent connections and threads are
you testing w/? Did you reduce the MSL on your client machines?
Default local port range probabl
07.08.2016 1:03, Eugene Grosbein пишет:
Hi!
Is there any high performance benchmark acting as http client for outer http
server
capable to receive 40Gbps without overwhelming CPU with insane number of
syscalls?
I've tried benchmarks/wrk version 4.0.2 and it works just fine upto 20Gbps
for my
I'm not sure it will help you at those levels, but have you tried boom?
https://github.com/rakyll/boom
On 06/08/2016 19:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hi!
Is there any high performance benchmark acting as http client for
outer http server
capable to receive 40Gbps without overwhelming CPU with ins
Hi!
Is there any high performance benchmark acting as http client for outer http
server
capable to receive 40Gbps without overwhelming CPU with insane number of
syscalls?
I've tried benchmarks/wrk version 4.0.2 and it works just fine upto 20Gbps
for my hardware: two 6-core (HT disabled) Intel(
