Hi all.
Just for information, ipsec-tools version of racoon has just been
integrated in the ports, with NAT-T support configured as "kernel"
(which means "test if the kernel supports it").
So I guess it will now be really interesting to have kernel NAT-T
support directly in FreeBSD kernel, as it
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Matthew Grooms wrote:
There was also some mention of a third claim but it was hard to find
details on the subject. Lastly, some people voiced concerns regarding
ietf.org -> IPR -> Search -> NAT-T
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cg
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> Not sure if this helps at all, but I did some searching a bit to read
> others comments concerning the NAT-T / IPR debate. These two documents
> get mentioned repeatedly and would appear to have something to do with
> other vendors decision to adopt NAT-
Not sure if this helps at all, but I did some searching a bit to read
others comments concerning the NAT-T / IPR debate. These two documents
get mentioned repeatedly and would appear to have something to do with
other vendors decision to adopt NAT-T support.
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/MICROS
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 08:51:55PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
[NAT-T, IPR, etc]
> > More infos about that may be get from Emmanuel Dreyfus, a NetBSD
> > developper and a member of the ipsec-tools team, which made the NetBSD
> > NAT-T support, and told me a few month ago that NetBSD lawyers we
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 08:51:55PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
[IPSec, NAT-T, IPR]
> do you have more info about this?
I asked for more informations from NetBSD team, waiting for answers.
For ipsec-tools project, our decision for such IPR potential problems
was to provide features as optionnal,
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
Hi,
> > Yes ( as a user ) but I am not a FreeBSD developer. I think there was
> > initially resistance from open source groups to integrate this support
> > due to patent issues ( maybe just WRT usage w/ IKEv1 ) but must have
> > been resolved as both O
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:34:54PM -0500, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> Woohoo!!! Thanks!!! I was just checking poking around for this last week
> and wondering when someone was going to bring this support to FreeBSD.
Well, I made at least one guy being happy today, cool :-)
> >For some months now, i
Woohoo!!! Thanks!!! I was just checking poking around for this last week
and wondering when someone was going to bring this support to FreeBSD.
>For some months now, ipsec-tools is now the "official" version of
>racoon, the KAME's isakmp daemon.
I hope it shows up in ports soon. The racoon port
