Heh, I tend to diff in the wrong order a lot. I'll go ahead and get it
committed then.
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> looks correct (apart from having to use patch -r to apply it...)
>
> cheers
> luigi
>
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 07:03:20PM +,
looks correct (apart from having to use patch -r to apply it...)
cheers
luigi
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 07:03:20PM +, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> Luigi, does this patch look good? AFAIK, the code you added should handle
> printing errors in these two cases; is that correct?
>
>
Luigi, does this patch look good? AFAIK, the code you added should handle
printing errors in these two cases; is that correct?
Thanks,
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
--- if_fxp.cSun Feb 3 19:01:14 2002
+++ if_fxp.c.oldSun Feb 3 18:59:55 2002
@@ -1836,6 +1836,8 @@
if (m != NU
