On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 07:48:32PM +, Stef Walter wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > there are two ways to go with this one being what you have done teh
> > other to add fib info to the messages, Apparently
> > OpenBSD has implemented the second by re-using a disused field.
> > (I'm ve only be
Li, Qing wrote:
> There are other commands through the routing socket that
> can trigger routing messages. For example, issuing "ifconfig"
> to add and remove interface addresses.
Thanks for taking a look at this and catching that problem. Here's a new
patch which does the following:
* Both rt_d
The following reply was made to PR kern/134931; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Stef Walter
To: "Li, Qing"
Cc: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" ,
bug-follo...@freebsd.org, jul...@elischer.org
Subject: Re: kern/134931 [patch] Unbreak setfib + routing daemons
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 09
Julian Elischer wrote:
> there are two ways to go with this one being what you have done teh
> other to add fib info to the messages, Apparently
> OpenBSD has implemented the second by re-using a disused field.
> (I'm ve only been told this second hand)
It seems like they've taken apart the rtm_fl
Stef Walter wrote:
Currently route messages are sent to all listeners of PF_ROUTE,
regardless or which FIB the listener socket was started on.
The upshot of this is that one can't really use routing daemons together
with multiple FIBs. The routing daemon sees the messages from the
alternate FIBs
with them, which may need fixing.
-- Qing
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Stef Walter
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 10:03 AM
> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
> Subject: [patch] Unbr
Currently route messages are sent to all listeners of PF_ROUTE,
regardless or which FIB the listener socket was started on.
The upshot of this is that one can't really use routing daemons together
with multiple FIBs. The routing daemon sees the messages from the
alternate FIBs and rapidly gets con
