Ermal,
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:05:16PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
E> >> I'm afraid we can't grow mbuf packet header with 8 bytes just to satisfy
E> >> the ALTQ codel algo, which would definitely have a limited usage among
E> >> FreeBSD users. Thus, "enqueue_time" should go into mbuf_tags(9) not
On 6/14/13 6:08 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:51:25PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Ermal,
...
I'm afraid we can't grow mbuf packet header with 8 bytes just to satisfy
the ALTQ codel algo, which would definitely have a limited usage among
FreeBSD users. Thus, "enqueue_time
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 14.06.2013 11:51, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
>>Ermal,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:43:12PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
>> E> at location [1] can be found a patch for Codel[3] algorithm
>> implementation.
>> E>
>> E> Triggered by a mai
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:51:25PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T> Assuming all above is taken into account, IMHO, the patch is okay to be
included
T> into FreeBSD. Thanks!
P.S. Patch also lacks update to manual pages altq.9 and pf.conf.5. These
should be written and committed in one commit with t
On 14.06.2013 11:51, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Ermal,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:43:12PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
E> at location [1] can be found a patch for Codel[3] algorithm implementation.
E>
E> Triggered by a mail to the mailing lists[2] of OpenBSD i completed the
E> implementation for FreeBS
Luigi,
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:08:28PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
L> > I'm afraid we can't grow mbuf packet header with 8 bytes just to satisfy
L> > the ALTQ codel algo, which would definitely have a limited usage among
L> > FreeBSD users. Thus, "enqueue_time" should go into mbuf_tags(9) not i
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:51:25PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Ermal,
...
> I'm afraid we can't grow mbuf packet header with 8 bytes just to satisfy
> the ALTQ codel algo, which would definitely have a limited usage among
> FreeBSD users. Thus, "enqueue_time" should go into mbuf_tags(9) not int
Ermal,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:43:12PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
E> at location [1] can be found a patch for Codel[3] algorithm implementation.
E>
E> Triggered by a mail to the mailing lists[2] of OpenBSD i completed the
E> implementation for FreeBSD.
E>
E> It allows to use codel as the sing
Hello,
at location [1] can be found a patch for Codel[3] algorithm implementation.
Triggered by a mail to the mailing lists[2] of OpenBSD i completed the
implementation for FreeBSD.
It allows to use codel as the single configured discipline on an interface.
Also it can be used as a sub disciplin
