Re: [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE

2007-03-21 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Friday 16 March 2007 02:30 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for > RELENG_6_2): > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bge_releng6.diff > > I received few success reports but I need wider testing because > changes are too big and there are two many B

Re: [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE

2007-03-19 Thread Pete French
> Mine applied cleanly to sources from last Friday. O.K., that works (now I have the correct date in my supfile). Will give it a shot... -pete. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE

2007-03-19 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 12:28 PM 3/19/2007, Pete French wrote: > I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for > RELENG_6_2): What dates stable is this relative to ? I am trying to apply your patch to a cvsup of stable pulled on the day/time you sent your email, but parts of it are failing for me unf

Re: [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE

2007-03-19 Thread Pete French
> I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for > RELENG_6_2): What dates stable is this relative to ? I am trying to apply your patch to a cvsup of stable pulled on the day/time you sent your email, but parts of it are failing for me unfortunately. I would like to test this as I

[PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE

2007-03-16 Thread Jung-uk Kim
I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for RELENG_6_2): http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bge_releng6.diff I received few success reports but I need wider testing because changes are too big and there are two many BCM57xx variants out there. If it breaks anything, please let