Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Do you have any architectural reservations about nested VLANs in
the main network stack? Presently, a one-line patch can allow a
vlan(4) to attach to another vlan(4), but I haven't heard about the
behaviour of the resulting setup yet.
After looking around it seems there is d
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:18:49PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Hi,
I have tested my 802.1p input patch with vlans configured. So far so good.
It is now available from:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~bms/dump/latest-8021p.diff
/*
* If the device did not perfor
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:18:49PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tested my 802.1p input patch with vlans configured. So far so good.
>
> It is now available from:
> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~bms/dump/latest-8021p.diff
>
/*
* If the device did not perform decapsulatio
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:18:49PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
>
> What has not been tested or considered is the situation where we have
> nested VLANs. At least one individual has asked about this feature. At
> the moment, I'd suggest that only Netgraph potentially deals with this
> rather than
Hi,
I have tested my 802.1p input patch with vlans configured. So far so good.
It is now available from:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~bms/dump/latest-8021p.diff
This updated patch moves the 802.1q encapsulation into if_ethersubr.c,
allowing
M_VLANTAG to be passed up and down the stack for 802
