On 21 May 2009, at 18:37, David DeSimone wrote:
Zachary Loafman wrote:
After correcting the above, any SYN that doesn't exactly match
the initial sequence number results in a RST|ACK response and the
ESTABLISHED connection being dropped.
Maybe I am jumping to conclusions here, but does thi
Zachary Loafman wrote:
>
> After correcting the above, any SYN that doesn't exactly match
> the initial sequence number results in a RST|ACK response and the
> ESTABLISHED connection being dropped.
Maybe I am jumping to conclusions here, but does this mean that someone
can spoof a SYN from your I
On May 19, 2009, at 17:13 , Zachary Loafman wrote:
net@ -
A short patch attached that requires 3 paragraphs of explanation.
We found an issue in TCP when the a client connects to our server,
establishes a connection, reboots and chooses the same source port to
re-establish the connection. Thi
net@ -
A short patch attached that requires 3 paragraphs of explanation.
We found an issue in TCP when the a client connects to our server,
establishes a connection, reboots and chooses the same source port to
re-establish the connection. This isn't hard from other vendors'
clients. On Solaris, t
